بازاریابی کار آفرینانه: نظریه جدید در باب همکاری موثر دانشگاه با صنعت
محورهای موضوعی : تخصصیسید مسعود قریشی 1 , مهدی مجیدپور 2 * , بابک نگاهداری 3 , مرتضی مرتضی موسی خانی 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه کارآفرینی، دانشگاه آزاد اسالمی واحد قزوین، قزوین، ایران
2 - دانشیار، گروه مدیریت کسب و کار، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشیار، گروه زیست فناوری پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی تهران، تهران، ایران
4 - استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسالمی واحد علوم تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: دانشگاه و صنعت, راهبرد بازاریابی , دانشگاه کارآفرین,
چکیده مقاله :
بازاریابی برای دانشگاه موضوع پیچیده و چند بعدی است چرا که دانشگاه‌ها مجبور هستند با تنوع قابل توجهی از مخاطبان ارتباط بگیرند. این مقاله سعی دارد تا نظریه جدیدی در باب همکاری مؤثر دانشگاه با صنعت ارائه نماید. مطالعه حاضر، ضمن تبیین ویژگی های چارچوب طبقه بندی رویکردهای بازاریابی در دانشگاه های دنیا، ساز و کارهای لازم برای بازاریابی توانمندی های دانشگاه در تمام زمینه های آموزش، پژوهش و کارآفرینی ارائه می دهد. بر این اساس با استفاده از رویکرد تلفیقی (کمی – کیفی) و استفاده از پرسشنامه ای 30 سؤالی، با تعداد 57 نفر از خبرگان دانشگاه، نهادی تامین مالی، تشکل ها و انجمن ها، دولت و صنعت مصاحبه صورت گرفت. با بررسی های انجام گرفته، ده راهبرد که به ترتیب شامل: تشکیل شبکه ای از متخصصین صنعت و دانشگاه جهت بهبود روابط و مشارکت ها، قراردادهای همکاری در اجرای پروژه های تاسیس مراکز تحقیقاتی و دانش بنیان با بخش خصوصی و صنعت، برگزاری جلسات و حفظ ارتباطات به صورت مستمر با نمایندگان صنایع و بخش خصوصی، قراردادهای همکاری دانشگاه با بخش خصوصی جهت تأمین مالی و سرمایه گذاری تأسیس مراکز تحقیقاتی و قطب های علمی، ایجاد یک واحد بازاریابی در دانشگاه جهت ارتقاء بازاریابی و در نتیجه بالا بردن درآمد دانشگاه، همکاری در قالب بستن قراردادهای چند جانبه در جهت تامین مالی و اجرای پروژه های تأسیس مراکز تحقیقاتی و دانش بنیان، استفاده بهینه از فضای دانشگاه جهت ارائه به شرکت های فعال بخش خصوصی، اصلاح وبسایت دانشگاه با رویکردهای نوین مدیریتی و بازاریابی، ایجاد قراردادهای همکاری با شرکت فعال حوزه بازاریابی و بازاریابی دیجیتال و ایجاد روش تأمین مالی جمعی هستند، برای بهبود همکاری دانشگاه و صنعت پیشنهاد شد.
Marketing for the university is a complex and multidimensional issue because, universities have to communicate with a significant variety of audiences. In this article, the necessary mechanisms for marketing the capabilities of the university in all fields of education, research and entrepreneurship are presented and prioritized. Accordingly, using an integrated approach (quantitative-qualitative) and using a 30-item questionnaire, 57 academic and industrial experts were interviewed. Based on the studies, ten strategies, which include: forming a network of industry and university experts to improve relations and partnerships, cooperation agreements in the implementation of projects to establish research and knowledge-based centers with the private sector and industry, holding meetings and maintaining Continuous communication with representatives of industry and the private sector, university cooperation agreements with the private sector to finance and invest in the establishment of research centers and scientific hubs, the establishment of a marketing unit in the university to promote marketing and thus increase university revenue, cooperation in Formation of multilateral contracts for financing and implementation of projects for the establishment of research and knowledge-based centers, optimal use of campus university space to be presented to active companies in the private sector, modification of the university website with new management and marketing approaches, creation Cooperation agreements with companies active in the field of digital marketing and marketing and the creation of crowdfunding and public financing methods were proposed to improve the relationship between academia and industry
شفیعی، مسعود و موسوی، عبدالرضا (1392)، تحلیل محتوای موانع، فرصتها و راهکارهای توسعه ارتباط صنعت و دانشگاه در پانزده کنگره سه جانبه، دو فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، سال اول، شماره 3، ص 22-5.
مهدی، رضا و شفیعی، مسعود (1400)، ریشه یابی سست پیوندی دانشگاه ایرانی با صنعت از دیدگاه خبرگان آموزش عالی، دو فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، دوره دهم، شماره 19، ص 39-54
مسعود، شفیعی (1399) کنگره بیست و سوم دولت، دانشگاه و صنعت برای توسعه ملی -دانشگاه گیلان
Aguiar-Díaz, I., Díaz-Díaz, N.L., Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J.L. and De Saa-Perez, P., 2016. University–industry relations and research group production: is there a bidirectional relationship?. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(4), pp.611-632. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtv042
Ali-Choudhury, R., Bennett, R. and Savani, S., 2009. University marketing directors’ views on the components of a university brand. International review on public and nonprofit marketing, 6(1), p.11. DOI: 10.1007/s12208-008-0021-6
Assimakopoulos, C., Antoniadis, I., Kayas, O.G. and Dvizac, D., 2017. Effective social media marketing strategy: Facebook as an opportunity for universities. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. DOI: 10.1108/IJRDM-11-2016-0211
Baaken, T., Davey, T. and Rossano, S., 2016. Marketing—Making a Difference for Entrepreneurial Universities. In Making a Difference Through Marketing (pp. 247-265). Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0464-3_18
Baaken, T. and Rossano, S., 2016. Academic entrepreneurship: a science-to-business marketing prospective. Knowledge and technology transfer in México and Germany, pp.99-115.
Belitski, M., Aginskaja, A. and Marozau, R., 2019. Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding?. Research Policy, 48(3), pp.601-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.011
Boardman, P.C., Ponomariov, B.L., 2009. University researchers working with private companies. Technovation 29 (2), 142–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.008 in Belitski, M., Aginskaja, A. and Marozau, R., 2019. Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding?. Research Policy, 48(3), pp.601-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.011
Buckling, L.P. and Sengupta, S. (1993) ‘Organizing successful co-marketing alliances’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp.32–46. DOI: 10.1177%2F002224299305700203 In Marzo-Navarro, M., Pedraja-Iglesias, M. and Rivera-Torres, P., 2009. The marketing approach in relationships between universities and firms. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 8(2), pp.127-147, DOI: 10.1080/15332660902876869.
Chapleo, C., 2007. Barriers to brand building in UK universities?. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(1), pp.23-32. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.271
Czarnitzki, D. and Rammer, C., 2003. Technology transfer via the internet: A way to link public science and enterprises?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(2), pp.131-147. DOI: 10.1023/A:102299041.
Eze, P., 2017. Marketing Segmentation and Fund Raising of Public Universities in South East Nigeria. Journal of Policy and Development Studies, 289(5385), pp.1-9. DOI: 10.12816/0040083
Ferreira JM, Leitao J, Raposo M (2007) The role of entrepreneurial universities in competitive advantage: the case of Beira Interior Region, MPRA Paper, No. 486, Madrid In Baaken, T., Davey, T. and Rossano, S., 2016. Marketing—Making a Difference for Entrepreneurial Universities. In Making a Difference Through Marketing (pp. 247-265). Springer, Singapore.
Ferru, M., 2010. Formation process and geography of science–industry partnerships: the case of the University of Poitiers. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), pp.531-549. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2010.509998.
Frasquet, M., Calderón, H. and Cervera, A., 2012. University–industry collaboration from a relationship marketing perspective: An empirical analysis in a Spanish University. Higher Education, 64(1), pp.85-98, DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9482-3.
Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L. and Okamuro, H., 2014. Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea. Technovation, 34(10), pp.605-616. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.006.
Javani, V., 2016. University branding: A conceptualizing model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(4), pp.227-232. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i4/2100
Labaree, D.F., 2017. A perfect mess: The unlikely ascendancy of American higher education. University of Chicago Press. In Skinner, N.A. and Ramirez, F.O., 2019. Marketing the American University: Professionalization of Development in Entrepreneurial Universities. In Universities as Agencies (pp. 185-207). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Johnston, A. and Huggins, R., 2018. Partner selection and university-industry linkages: Assessing small firms' initial perceptions of the credibility of their partners. Technovation, 78, pp.15-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.005.
Liu, Y. and Huang, Q., 2018. University capability as a micro-foundation for the Triple Helix model: The case of China. Technovation, 76, pp.40-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.013.
Marzo-Navarro, M., Pedraja-Iglesias, M. and Rivera-Torres, P., 2009. The marketing approach in relationships between universities and firms. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 8(2), pp.127-147, DOI: 10.1080/15332660902876869.
McKenna, R. (1991) Relationship Marketing: Successful Strategies for the Age of the Customer. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA. IN Sheth, J.N. and Parvatiyar, A., 1995. The evolution of relationship marketing. International business review, 4(4), pp.397-418.
Motta, J. and Barbosa, M., 2018. Social media as a marketing tool for European and North American universities and colleges. Journal of Intercultural Management, 10(3), pp.125-154. DOI: 10.2478/joim-2018-0020
Muscio, A. and Vallanti, G., 2014. Perceived obstacles to university–industry collaboration: Results from a qualitative survey of Italian academic departments. Industry and Innovation, 21(5), pp.410-429. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2014.969935.
Naude, P. and Ivy, J., 1999. The marketing strategies of universities in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(3), pp.126-136. DOI: 10.1108/09513549910269485.
Parvatiyar, A. and Sheth, J.N. (1994) ‘Paradigm shift in marketing theory and approach: the emergence of relationship marketing’, in Sheth, J. and Parvatiyar, A. (Eds): Relationship Marketing: Theory, Methods and Applications Section I, Center for Relationship Marketing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. In Plewa, C., Quester, P. and Baaken, T., 2005. Relationship marketing and university-industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 5(4), pp.433-456, DOI: 10.1177/1470593105058824.
Plewa, C., Quester, P. and Baaken, T., 2005. Relationship marketing and university-industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 5(4), pp.433-456, DOI: 10.1177/1470593105058824.
Prabowo, H.A., 2015. Winning Competition through the Management of Word of Mouth Viral Marketing, and Brand Equity on Private Universities. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5 S5), p.118. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s5p118
Rajalo, S. and Vadi, M., 2017. University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62, pp.42-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.003.
Rosendo-Rios, V., Ghauri, P. and Zhang, Y., 2016. Empirical analysis of the key factors that can contribute to university–industry cooperational success from a relationship marketing approach. European Journal of International Management, 10(6), pp.647-677, DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2016.079524.
Shani, D. and Chalasani, S. (1991) Exploiting Niches Using Relationship Marketing. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, pp. 33-42. IN Sheth, J.N. and Parvatiyar, A., 1995. The evolution of relationship marketing. International business review, 4(4), pp.397-418.
Sheth, J.N. and Parvatiyar, A. (1995) ‘The evolution of relationship marketing’, International Business Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.397–418. DOI: 10.1016/0969-5931(95)00018-6 In Plewa, C., Quester, P. and Baaken, T., 2005. Relationship marketing and university-industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 5(4), pp.433-456, DOI: 10.1177/1470593105058824.
Skinner, N.A. and Ramirez, F.O., 2019. Marketing the American University: Professionalization of Development in Entrepreneurial Universities. In Universities as Agencies (pp. 185-207). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Steinmo, M., 2015. Collaboration for innovation: A case study on how social capital mitigates collaborative challenges in university–industry research alliances. Industry and innovation, 22(7), pp.597-624. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2015.1105127.
Stevens, M.L., Miller-Idriss, C. and Shami, S., 2018. Seeing the world: How US universities make knowledge in a global era (Vol. 74). Princeton University Press. IN Skinner, N.A. and Ramirez, F.O., 2019. Marketing the American University: Professionalization of Development in Entrepreneurial Universities. In Universities as Agencies (pp. 185-207). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Victor, M., 2017. How could universities use trade shows better?: Exhibit marketing for universities.
Wang, W.L., Malthouse, E.C., Calder, B. and Uzunoglu, E., 2019. B2B content marketing for professional services: In-person versus digital contacts. Industrial Marketing Management, 81, pp.160-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.006.
Weckowska, D.M., 2015. Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41, pp.62-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.003
Weijo, R.O., 1987. Strategies for promoting technology transfer to the private sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 11(2), pp.43-65. DOI: 10.1007/BF02174378
Zalewska-Kurek, K., Kandemir, S., Englis, B.G., Englis, P.D., 2016. Development of market driven business models in the IT industry. How firms experiment with their business models? J. Busi. Models 4 (3), 48. DOI: 10.5278/ojs.jbm.v4i3.1879 In Belitski, M., Aginskaja, A. and Marozau, R., 2019. Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding?. Research Policy, 48(3), pp.601-615.