Scenarios and Patterns of Future Higher Education in the Horizon of 1410
Subject Areas : General
Reza Mahdi
1
*
,
masoud shafiee
2
,
Ahmad keykha
3
1 - Associate Professor, Department of Prospective Studies, Institute of Cultural and Social Studies, Tehran, Iran
2 - Professor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 - Doctoral student of higher education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: higher education perspective, higher education futurology, future higher education models, higher education scenarios,
Abstract :
Researching the future, developing future scenarios, and providing requirements and solutions to face the future are essential responsibilities of policymakers, leaders, and planners of higher education. Various factors and drivers, especially information and communication technologies and digital developments, have transformed universities' role in shaping the more comprehensive higher education system. In this article, based on the study of Orr et al. (2020), five scenarios and models of higher education for 2010 are presented. These scenarios include Tamagotchi, Jenga, Lego, Transformer, and Garbage Can. The Tamagotchi model is a classic approach to higher education that begins immediately after high school, leads to a bachelor's or master's degree, leads to a job, and ends the path to higher education. The Jenga model is more attractive to non-traditional students in short-term learning courses and focuses on the following stages of self-learning and organization. The Lego model is named separate composite modules of different sizes that create a self-contained, non-standardized learning path rather than a compact unit. The Transformer model represents learners who may be extended past their primary education but return to higher education to gain new knowledge or upgrade needed skills. According to this model, everyone should have opportunities to leave their current career path and change it. In the Garbage Can scenario, learners choose a combination of Tamagotchi, Jenga, Lego, and Transformer scenarios according to their work-life situation and individual goals. Universities and educational institutions depend on the institutional mission and focal values. In this scenario, applicants and academic institutions will have multiple teaching-learning choices. Digital developments are technical innovation and social innovation, the consequences of which should be considered for society, the labor market, and the higher education systemThe Tamagotchi model is a classic approach to higher education that begins immediately after high school, leads to a bachelor's or master's degree, leads to a job, and ends the path to higher education. The Jenga model is more attractive to non-traditional students in short-term learning courses and focuses on the next stages of self-learning and organization. The LEGO model is named as separate composite modules of different sizes that create a self-contained, non-standardized learning path rather than a compact unit. The transformer model represents learners who may be long past their basic education, but return to higher education to gain new knowledge or upgrade needed skills. According to this model, everyone should have opportunities to leave their current career path and change it. In the Karbeijken scenario, learners choose a combination of Tamagotchi, Jenga, Lego, and Transformer scenarios according to their work-life situation and individual goals, and universities and educational institutions depending on the institutional mission and focal values..
پورانجنار، گل‌بهار؛ سالارزهی، حبیب‌الله؛ تباور، علی‌اصغر و یعقوبی، نورمحمد (1401). شناسایی و دسته‌بندی الگوی ذهنی صاحب‌نظران در خصوص پیشران‌های در دانشگاه‌ها و موسسات آموزش عالی: رویکردی آمیخته. فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش‌آفرینی، 11 (21): 91-116.
حیدری، امیرهوشنگ (1395). آینده‌پژوهی در روش دلفی. مجله ترویج علم، 10.
عبدی، حمید؛ میرشاه جعفری، ابراهیم؛ نیلی، محمدرضا و رجایی‌پور، سعید (1396). تبیین افق 1404 آموزش عالی ایران با استفاده از روش سناریونویسی. فصلنامه آموزش عالی ایران، 9 (4).
فاتح‌راد، مهدی؛ جلیلوند، محمدرضا؛ مولایی، محمدمهدی؛ سمیعی، سعید و نصرالله، فاطمه (1392). مختصات روش‌شناختی فرارشته آینده‌پژوهی به مثابه یک فراپاردایم یکپارچه. فصلنامه مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 1 (21).
محمدآیادی، معصومه؛ نیازآذری، کیومرث و جباری، نگین (1397). نقش سرمایه فکری در ارتقاء عملکرد شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی: یک پژوهش کیفی. فصلنامه آینده‌پژوهی مدیریت، 114 (29).
مهدی، رضا؛ شفیعی، مسعود (1398). ریشه‌یابی سست پیوندی دانشگاه ایرانی با صنعت از دیدگاه خبرگان آموزش‌عالی. نوآوری و ارزش‌آفرینی، 10 (19): 54-39.
Andersson, L. F., Alaja, A., & Buhr, D. (2016). Policies for innovation in times of digitalization. Arena idé, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Kalevi Sorsa Foundation. Retrieved from
http://arenaide.se/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/09/policies-for-innovation-in-times-of digitalization-160929.pdf
Boni, A. and Walker, M. (2016), Universities and Global Human Development: Theoretical and empirical insights for social change, New York and London, Routledge.
Buhr, D. (2015). Soziale Innovationspolitik für die Industrie 4.0. Friedlich-Ebert-Stiftung. Retrieved from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/11302.pdf
Grech, A., & Camilleri, A. F. (2017). Blockchain in education. https://doi.org/10.2760/60649
Henderikx, P., & Jansen, D. (2018). The changing pedagogical landscape: In search of patterns in policies and practices of new modes of teaching and learning. EADTU. Retrieved from eadtu.eu
Horn, M. (2018). WeWork spurs online learning’s next step forward. Retrieved from https://www. forbes.com/sites/michaelhorn/2018/10/04/wework-spurs-online-learnings-next-step-forward/# 3127daec2220
Jongbloed, B. (2015). Universities as hybrid organizations: Trends, drivers, and challenges for the European university. International Review of Public Administration, 45(3), 207–225. https://doi. org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1006027
Kaufmann, D. (Ed.). (2019). Digitalisierung—Chancen und Herausforderungen für die Universitäten Deutschlands. DUZ Verlags- und Medienahaus. Retrieved from https://www.duz-special.de/media/baf43cd48414beeb49d9c0f10c201bffdc160028/ b2038899609a089f5f5816656316d5b6f52e73e5.pdf
OECD. (2016). Automation and independent work in a digital economy (Policy brief on the future of work). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/Automation-and-independentwork- in-a-digital-economy-2016.pdf
Orr, D., & Buchem, I. (2019). Digitale Kompetenznachweise für lebenslanges Lernen. Retrieved from https://hochschulforumdigitalisierung.de/de/blog/digitale-kompetenznachweisefuer- lebenslanges-lernen
Orr, D., & Mishra, S. (2015). A comprehensive approach to investigating the social dimension in European higher education systems—EUROSTUDENT and the PL4SD country reviews. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies. Springer
Orr, D., & Usher, A. (2018). Revisiting student performance as a cornerstone of higher education- How is student performance reflected in performance-based funding? In E. Hazelkorn, H. Coates, & A. C. McCormick (Eds.), Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education. Springer.
Orr, D., Luebcke, M., Schmidt, J. P., Ebner, M., Wannemacher, K., Ebner, M., & Dohmen, D. (2020). Higher education landscape 2030: A trend analysis based on the ahead international horizon scanning (p. 59). Springer Nature.
Unger, M., & Zaussinger, S. (2018). Background paper- The new student: Flexible learning paths and future learning environments. Institute for Advanced Studies. Retrieved from
https://www.eu2018.at/dam/jcr:9998b09f-3e5d-439f-9c1f-e959f3ef649d/ Background_paper_(not_available_in_an_accessible_format)_(EN).pdf