Evaluation and Analysis of the Cultural and Social Environment of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Using the PFB Approach
Subject Areas : Promoting and developing entrepreneurial culture
Ali Karshenasan
1
*
,
Asieh Nejad Taheri
2
1 - Asiatant professor of Economics, Universit of Gonbad e Kavous, Iran
2 - Ph.D. Student of Entrepreneurship, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katul, Iran
Keywords: Entrepreneurial Cultural Wnvironment, Cultural Environment Cottlenecks, Ecosystem efficiency, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM), Penalty for Bottleneck (PFB).,
Abstract :
This study empirically analyzes the cultural and social environment as a pillar of the entrepreneurial ecosystem and its impact on business performance and entrepreneurship development in Iran. Using data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) for 2019–2020, the research applies the Penalty for Bottleneck (PFB) methodology, grounded in the weakest-link theory and the theory of constraints. The cultural and social environment is operationalized through two sub-indices: Perceived Entrepreneurship (PE) and Social Values of Entrepreneurship (SE), comprising ten pillars. The main objective is to identify bottlenecks, measure penalties imposed on stronger pillars, and prioritize policy interventions. The findings reveal that the “ease of starting a business” pillar (normalized value = 0.35) acts as the bottleneck. It imposes the largest penalties on “high social status of entrepreneurs” (−0.15), “media attention to entrepreneurship” (−0.08), and “perception of entrepreneurial capabilities” (−0.08). The PE sub-index decreases from 53% to 50%, the SE sub-index from 71% to 65%, and the overall Cultural Environment Index (BEI) from 62% to 58% after applying PFB. However, ecosystem efficiency (ABE) improves from 56.24% to 61.96% after penalty application, indicating that addressing the bottleneck enhances balance. The study concludes that entrepreneurship policies should target the weakest pillars rather than reinforcing stronger ones. The findings offer a systemic framework for improving Iran’s entrepreneurial cultural ecosystem and reducing policy intervention costss
احمد پور داریانی، محمود (1381)، کارآفرینی، تعاریف، نظریه ها، الگو ها، تهران، انتشارات پردیس
موحدی رضا و یعقوبی فرانی، احمد (1391)، درآمدی بر کارآفرینی روستایی، همدان، انتشارات دانشگاه بوعلی سینا
ریاحی، پریسا (1395)، پایش و بهبود نظام کارآفرینی ایران؛ گزارش اول شناخت وضع موجود و مطالعه تطبیقی با کشور های منطقه خاورمیانه، معاونت توسعه کارآفرینی و اشتغال، وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی
شیهکی تاش، مهیم و منصوری، لقمان (1399)، تحلیلی و بررسی شاخص های فرهنگی هافستد و تاثیر آن بر کارآفرینی در اکوسیستم کارآفرینی دانش بنیان (مطالعه موردی: استان سیستان و بلوچستان)، جامعه شناسی اقتصادی و توسعه، دوره 9، شماره 2، صص 233-251.
زالی ، محمد رضا، یدالهی فارسی، جهانگیر و مصطفی رضوی (1395) گزارش هشتمین برنامه پژوهشی؛ ارزیابی شاخص های کارآفرینی در ایران بر اساس مدل دیده بان جهانی کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران
جلالی، رضا (1399)، ارزیابی اکوسیستم کارآفرینی استان بوشهر بر اساس برنامه دیده بان جهانی کارآفرینی ، طرح پژوهشی اجرا شده در دانشگاه خلیج فارس
نژاد طاهری، آسیه و کارشناسان، علی و محسن محمدی خیاره (1399)، ارزیابی و تحلیل اکوسیستم کارآفرینی و محیط کسب‌وکار استان‌ها با رویکرد نوین PFB، فصلنامه اقتصاد و توسعه منطقه ای ، دوره 27، شماره 20 صص101-127.
Acs, Z.J., Autio, E., &Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship:Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494
Alvarez, A.S., Young, L. and Woolley, L. (2015), “Opportunities and institutions: a co-creation story of the king crab industry”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 95-112
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proc-esses, 50(2), 179-211
Bosma, N., Jonse, K., Autio, E., &Levie, J. (2008). GEM 2007 executive report. Babson College, London Business School, and Global Entrepreneurship Research Consortium (GERA
Cacciotti, G., & Hayton, J. C. (2017). National Culture and Entrepreneurship.
The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship, 401-422.
Chambers, R., & Lake, A. (2004). In focus program on skills, knowledge and employability. Skills Working Paper, No. 3, International Labor Office, Geneva
Casson, M. (2002). Entrepreneurship. The concise encyclopedia of economics. Retrieved from http://www. econlib.org/library/Enc/Entrepreneurship.html
Davari,Ali& Amer Dehghannajm Abadi, 2018. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and Performance in Iran. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
Freeman, J. H., &Audia, P. G. (2006) Community ecology and the sociology of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology: 145-169
Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 33-52
Hofstede , greet., (2011). “dimentionalizing cultures: the hofestede model in context” .
international association for cross-cultural psychology, no. 8
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in workrelated values (Vol. 5): sage.
Isabelle, D. (2013). Key factors affecting a technology entrepreneur's choice of incubator or
accelerator. Technology innovation management review, 16-22.
Isenberg, D. 2011. The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, May 12, 2011, Dublin Ireland. Available on line at http://entrepreneurial-revolution.com/ (last accessed: 01/27/2012). 1-32p
Levie,J.&Autio, E (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the Gem model . small Business Economics, 31 (3).
Martins,s;.Couchi, C., Parat, L., Federico, C., Roberto, D., & Maureen, S. (2004), Barriers to entrepreneurship and business creationEEC/Act04/02, European Entrepreneurship Cooperation
Miller, D., 1986, "Configurations of strategy and structure: towards a synthesis", Strategic
Management Journal, 7(3), pp. 233-249
Schoof, U. (2006). Stimulating youth entrepreneurship: Barriers and incentives to enterprise start-ups by young people. SEED Working Paper, No. 76, International Labor Office, Geneva, Switzerland
Spigel, B., 2015. The Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems,. Entrepreneurship:
Theory & Practice
Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic
Critique. European Planning Studies, 1759–1769
Suddle, k; Beugelsdijkb, S., &Wennekers, S.(2007). Entrepreneurial culture and its effect on the rate of nascent entrepreneurship. Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs. Retrieved from http:// www. Entrepreneurship-SME. Eu/ PDF-ez/ H200715. PDF
TionAutio, E. (2007). 2007 global report on high growth entrepreneurship. Babson College, London Business School, and Global Entrepreneurship Research Consortium (GERA
Thornton Patricia H., Ribeiro-Soriano,Domingo and Urbano. (2011). “David Socio-cultural
factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview”. International Small Business Journal,29(2)
105–118
Thompson, J. & Geoff, A. & Lees, A., (2000) The worls of the entrepreneur, vol. 38, No. 5
Tol, R. S. J. and G. W. Yohe (2006), ‘A Review of the Stern Review’, World Economics, 7, (4), 233–250
Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. Causation and Effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency, Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 243-288.