Analysis of Content-Structural- Barriers of Knowledge-Based Companies (Case of Study: International Science and Technology Park of Islamic Republic of Iran)

Abstract :

Knowledge-based companies, focusing on knowledge-intensive products and services, create significant leaps in national production and innovation. However, they continually face challenges in achieving their goals that require serious attention. The present study utilized grounded theory and content analysis techniques to identify and analyze the content-structural barriers of knowledge-based companies located in the International Science and Technology Park of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The study population consisted of 23 CEOs, executive managers, and technical specialists of knowledge-based companies, primarily active in the field of medical equipment and similar products. Sampling was performed using a purposive snowball method. Research validation was achieved through the examination of diverse perspectives, with data collection conducted at different times and locations involving experts from various groups. The structural and content challenges were categorized into 10 sub-categories, comprising 114 open codes. Findings revealed that in the structural dimension, "weakness in structure and organization," "deficiencies in human resource management," "ineffective processes, standards, and products," "financial and investment incapability," and "deficiencies in research and development" were among the most critical challenges. In the content dimension, "managerial weaknesses," "human resource shortcomings," "lack of market awareness," "deficiencies in innovation and new product development," and "weak organizational culture" were identified as major barriers faced by the studied companies

 

References:

1. الهیاری فرد، ن.، و عباسی، ر. (1390). بررسی الگوی مناسب ساختار سازمانی شرکت های دانش بنیان. فصلنامه ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ پاﺭﻙ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺭﺷﺪ، 8(29)، 54-47.
2. ثقفی، ف.، و حدادی، ج. (1397). ارائه مدل سنجش تأثیر خدمات پارک های علم و فناوری بر عملکرد نوآورانه شرکت های دانش بنیان مستقر در آن ها. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 6(2)، 127-101.
3. ذبیحی جامخانه، م. (1395). طراحی مدل دانش بنیان شدن مرکز مطالعات قرارگاه پدافند هوایی خاتم (ص) آجا، تهران: انتشارات قرارگاه پدافند هوایی خاتم.
4. رضائیان، ع.، نظافتی، ن.، و باقری، ر. (1397). شکل گیري شبکه دانش در شرکت¬هاي دانش¬بنیان. نشریه علمی- پژوهشی کاوش هاي مدیریت بازرگانی، 10(20)، 213-187.
5. رضوی، س.م.، فلاح حقیقی، ن.، رضوانفر، ا.، و کلانتری، خ. (1391). تحلیل موانع کارآفرینی در دانشکده‌های کشاورزی ایران (از دیدگاه دانشجویان. فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، (10)4، 78-59. 10.22059/jipa.2012.29131
6. سپهوند, ف.، غلامرضایی, س .، و فراشی, ز. (1400). بررسی ظرفیت‌های شوراهای روستایی برای بهبود مشارکت جوامع روستایی در انتخابات شهرستان خرم آباد. روستا و توسعه 24(3), 1-29. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2020.341206.1183
7. شقاقی, س.، قاضی نوری, س و شاکری,ر. (1403).چارچوب مفهومی یکپارچه سازی فرآیندهای مدیریت نوآوری، فناوری و دانش در توسعه محصول.فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی,24(12),1-32.
8. عسگری, م.، حبیبی تبار .، و قیوم زاده, م . (1401). واکاوی چالش‌های اداری حمایت از شرکت‌های دانش بنیان و راهکارهای اصلاح آن. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های نوین حقوق اداری
. doi: 10.22034/mral.2022.549449.1278, 4(13), 13-39
9. فرتاش, ک.، برامکی, ط.، صارمی, م,. و سعدابادی, ع.(1401). چالش‌های رشد شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان پیشگام فاوا. سیاست علم و فناوری. doi: 10.22034/jstp.2022.13957, 15(3), 41-54
10. فلاح حقیقی, ن .، و میرترابی, م. (1396). مشکلات شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان کشاورزی مستقر در سازمان پژوهش‌های علمی و صنعتی ایران. مطالعات کارآفرینی و توسعه پایدار کشاورزی, 4(4), 79-97. doi: 10.22069/jead.2018.14803.1322
11. قلی‌پور، م.، وحدت زاد، م.، اولیا، م.، و خادمی زارع، ح. (1394). شناسایی و اولویت بندی چالش های شرکت های دانش بنیان با استفاده از روش شبکه عصبی مصنوعی (مطالعه موردی: شرکت¬های دانش بنیان یزد). رشد فناوری، 12(45)، 17-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/144834/fa
12. کریمی، مسعود (1393)، ساختار سازمانی بر رضایت شغلی کارکنان، پایان نامه کارشناس ارشد، مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی
13. گلعلی‌زاده, م.، طباطبائیان, ح و زمردیان، غ. (1400). شناسایی و دسته بندی چالش های تامین مالی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان در ایران. مدیریت نوآوری 10(4), 1-27.
14. مرادی کوچی، ط و جواهری زاده، ا. (1402). مروری بر مفاهیم شرکت های دانش بنیان و چالش های دانشی پیش روی تجاری سازی، اولین کنفرانس ملی بدون نفت، چگونه؟،تهران،https://civilica.com/doc/1893881
15. نصری، ا. (1401). بررسی چالش‌ها و موانع پیش روی شرکت‌های دانش بنیان،https://civilica.com/doc /1646208
16. نوراللهی, س و قنبری، س .(1403). نقش مرزگستری دانشگاهیان در نوآوری سازمانی با میانجی‌گری چابکی سازمانی در دانشکده‌های فنی و مهندسی دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران. فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی24(12),161-182.
17. Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Modrego, A. (2018). The influence of science and technology park characteristics on firms’ innovation results. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12253.
18. Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95.‏
19. Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2020). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change
20. Bijani, M., Fallah Haghighi, N., Karami, G.H., Asgari Ghods, M., & Zand, M. (2015). An Investigation of Entrepreneurial Psychological Characteristics and Driving Forces and Hampering Factors Affecting of Entrepreneurship in Colleges of Agriculture (The case of Branches 5 of Islamic Azad University). Agricultural Extension and Education Research. 8(1): 79-94
21. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 32(1), 1-14.‏
22. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2020). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies.
23. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1994). The management of innovation. Oxford University Press.‏
24. Chesbrough, H. (2020). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology.
25. Chung, C., Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2020). Human Resource Management Practices and Innovative Work Behavior in the Context of Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 12(24), 10328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410328
26. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Mustar, P. (2009). Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research policy, 38(10), 1517-1533.‏
27. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). "On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital." Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610-626.
28. Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Wirsching, K. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: A principal investigator-centered governance framework. Small Business Economics, 52, 545-562.‏
29. Davis, S. M., & Meyer, C. (2021). The New Organizational Structures: Going Beyond Hierarchy. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/01/the-new-organizational-structures-going-beyond-hierarchy
30. Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). "Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems." Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120-1153.
31. Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575-632.‏
32. Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go?. Journal of management, 43(1), 200-227.‏
33. Gentile-Lüdecke, S., Torres de Oliveira, R., & Paul, J. (2020). Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs? Small Business Economics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00175-4.
34. Hahn, G. J., & Kuhn, H. (2020). Quality Management and Standardization.
35. Hopkins, M. S. (2011). How to Innovate When Platforms Wont Stop Moving. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(4), 55.‏
36. Huang, J., Henfridsson, O., Liu, M. J., & Newell, S. (2017). "Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation." MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 301-314.
37. Kang, S.-C., Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). "Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture." Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 236-256.
38. Khan, Z., Qureshi, M. N., & Khan, M. (2021). Innovation Process and Performance in Startups: The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Market Orientation. Journal of Business Research, 129, 897-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.058
39. Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (2020). Leadership: Do Traits Matter?
40. Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security, 24, 100347. Google Scholar
41. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2020). Marketing Management.
42. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). "Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies." Research Policy, 34(7), 1043-1057.
43. Maleki, H., & Ramezani, M. (2024). Challenges of Knowledge-Based Companies in Iran: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(3), 45-62. DOI: 10.22034/JSTP.2024.1234567
44. Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research policy, 48(8), 103773.‏
45. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2007). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard business review, 85(7/8), 162.‏
46. Pellegrino, G., Piva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2012). Young firms and innovation: A microeconometric analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 329-340.‏
47. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). "University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda." International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
48. Puranam, P., Alexy, O., & Reitzig, M. (2014). What's “new” about new forms of organizing?. Academy of management Review, 39(2), 162-180.‏
49. Putnam, R. D. (2020). The Upswing: How America Came Together a Century Ago and How We Can Do It Again. Simon & Schuster.
50. Rammer, C., Kinne, J., & Blind, K. (2020). Knowledge proximity and firm innovation: a microgeographic analysis for Berlin. Urban Studies, 57, 996–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018820241.
51. Rao, P., Kumar, A., & Rao, S. (2020). Financing Innovative Startups: A Study of Venture Capital and Its Impact on Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 112, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.027
52. Rickne, A., & Jacobsson, S. (1999). New technology-based firms in Sweden-a study of their direct impact on industrial renewal. Economics of innovation and new technology, 8(3), 197-223.‏
53. Rodriguez, M., Chen, L., & Patel, R. (2024). Talent acquisition and retention challenges in knowledge-intensive firms: Evidence from tech startups. Human Resource Management Review, 34(3), 112-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.100892
54. Rose, D. C., Sutherland, W. J., Parker, C., Lobley, M., Winter, M., Morris, C., & Twining, S. (2016). Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery. Agricultural Systems, 149, 165-174.
55. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). "Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures." Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 429-460.
56. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.‏
57. Schein, E. H. (2020). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Wiley.
58. Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Williams, C. (2024). Financial barriers and funding challenges in knowledge-based enterprises: A comprehensive analysis of startup ecosystems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 45-67. DOI: 10.1186/s13731-024-0298-5
59. Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of management review, 34(4), 689-709.
60. Teece, D. J. (2007). "Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance." Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350
61. Thompson, K., Anderson, D., & Lee, S. (2024). Commercialization challenges in knowledge-based companies: Market entry strategies and customer adoption barriers. Research Policy, 53(4), 789-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.104712
62. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2020). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change.
63. Torres de Oliveira, R., Verreynne, M., Figueira, S., Indulska, M., & Steen, J. (2020). How do institutional innovation systems affect open innovation? Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1775466
64. UNESCO (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Innovation for Sustainable Development. [https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index]
65. Van de Ven, A. H., Ganco, M., & Hinings, C. R. (2013). Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393-440.‏
66. Vanhaverbeke, W., & Cloodt, M. (2006). Open innovation in value networks. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 13, 258-281.‏
67. Wright, M., Liu, X., & Zhao, L. (2020). The Role of Government in the Development of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Global Perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 1231-1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719862985
68. Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business horizons, 55(3), 219-229.