jivc-140502291914050229190237CMV Verlagkhoffmann@cmv-verlag.comCMV VerlagJournal of Innovation and Value Creationjivc2717-04543172020815zahramohammadhashemiseied sepehrghazinorimahdisajadifar317202012610.66224/jivc.6551.8.15.1http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/6551http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6551http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6551http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6551http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6551http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6551http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6551http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/65511. آذر، عادل.، میرفخرالدینی، سیدحیدر.، انواری رستمی، علی اصغر (1387). بررسی مقایسه ای تحلیل داده ها در شش سیگما، با کمک ابزارهای آماری و فنون تصمیمگیری چند شاخصه، مجله مدرس علوم انسانی، دورة 12 شمارة 4 :1 -36 2. اصغرپور، محمدجواد(1388).تصمیم گیری های چند معیاره.انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 196-200. 3. سهرابی، بابک؛ اعظمی، امیر؛ یزدانی، حمیدرضا(1390). آسیب شناسی پژوهشهای انجام شده در زمینه مدیریت اسلامی با رویکرد فراترکیب. فصلنامه چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی. شاه‌طهماسبی، مجید.، جوادیان، مجید.، نیکبخت، محمدجواد. (1391). بررسی نقش اعطای تسهیلات به بنگاه‌های کوچک و متوسط صنعتی در ایجاد اشتغال (مورد مطالعه: کارگاه‌های صنعتی شهر تهران). فصلنامه علوم اقتصادی، 1، 30-7. 5. طیبی، سیدکمیل.، ساطعی، مهسا.، صمیمی، پریسا .(1389). تأثیر تسهیلات بانکی بر اشتغال‌زایی بخش‌های اقتصادی ایران. فصلنامه پول و اقتصاد، 4، 33-1. 6. Aralica,Z.,& Botrić,V.(2013) . Evaluation Of Research And Development Tax Incentive Scheme In Croatia ,Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research,26(3): 63-80. 7. Agrawal, A,. Rosell, C and Simcoe S.T.(2014).Do Tax Credits Affect R&D Expenditures by Small Firms? Evidence from Canada NBER Working Paper No. 20615 . 4. Aschhoff,B,.( 2009).The Effect of Subsidies on R&D Investment and Success – Do Subsidy History and Size Matter? . Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW). Success – Do Subsidy History and Size Matter? . Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW). 5. Alsos, G. A., T. Claussen, E. Ljunggren and E. L. Madsen (2007). Evaluering av SkatteFUNNs atferdsaddisjonalitet. I hvilken grad har SkatteFUNN ført til endret FoU-atferd i bedriftene? NF-rapport nr. 13/2007, Nordlandsforskning, Bodø. 6. Alecke, B., T. Mitze, J. Reinkowski and G. Untiedt (2012). ‘Does firm size make a difference? Analysing the effectiveness of R&D subsidies in East Germany’, German Economic Review, 13, 174–195. 7. Albors-Garrigos,J. and R.R. Barrera (2011). ‘Impact of public funding on a firm’s innovation performance:Analysis of internal and external moderating factors’, International Journal of Innovation Management,15, 1297–1322. 8. Almus, M. and D. Czarnitzki (2003). ‘The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms' Innovation Activities: The Case of Eastern Germany’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21(2), 226-236. 9. Afcha.s and García-Quevedo,J.(2014). The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition , CENTRUM Católica’s Working Paper No. 2014-11-0003. 10. Autio, E., S. Kanninen and R. Gustafsson (2008). ‘First-and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs’, Research Policy, 37, 59–76. 11. Arque-Castells P. and P. Mohnen, (2011). How can subsidies be effectively used to induce entry into R&D? Micro-dynamic evidence from Spain, International workshop on R&D Policy Impact Evaluation: Methods and Results, organised by Université Paris 1, ICN Business School and CREST with the support of the French Ministry for Higher Education and Research, Paris November 3 and 4. 12. Bloch, C., and Graversen, E.K. (2008). Additionality of public R&D funding in business R&D. Working Paper No 5. The Danish Center for Studies in Research and Research Policy, University of Aarhus, Denmark. 13. Bronzini, R. and Iachini, E. (2014). Are incentives for R&D effective? evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4):100–134. 14. Bozio, A., Irac, D., & Py, L. (2014). ‘Impact of research tax credit on R&D and innovation: evidence from the 2008 French reform’, Paris: Banque de France. 15. Bérubé, C. and Mohnen, P. (2009) .Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(1): 206-225. 16. Bench, S., & Day, T. (2010). The user experience of critical care discharge: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International journal of nursing studies, 47(4), 487–499. 17. Billings, B.A., B.G.N. Musazi and J.W. Moore (2004). ‘The effects of funding source and management ownership on the productivity of R&D’, R&D Management, 34, 281–294. 18. Busom, I. and A. Fernandez-Ribas(2008). ‘The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships’, Research Policy, 37, 240–257. 19. Buisseret, T.J., Cameron,H.M.and Georghiou, L., 1995. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4/5/6),pp 587-600. 20. Czarnitzki, D. and G. Licht (2006). ‘Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: The case of Eastern Germany’, Economics of Transition, 14, 101–131. 21. Cerulli, G. and B. Poti (2012). ‘The differential impact of privately and publicly funded R&D on R&D investment and innovation: The Italian case’, Prometheus, 30, 113–149. 22. Corchuelo, B. and E. Martinez-Ros(2009). ‘The effects of fiscal incentives for R&D in Spain’, Business Economics Working Paper No. wb092302, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economia de la Empresa. 23. Czarnitzki, D. and K. Hussinger (2004). The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-56, Mannheim. 24. Carvalho,A.(2011). Why are tax incentives increasingly used to promote private R&D?. CEFAGE-UE Working Paper. 25. Chapman,G., Hewitt-dundas, N.(2015).Behavioural Additionality: An Innovation Orientation Perspective presented at the DRUID Academy conference in Rebild, Aalborg, Denmark on January21-23, 2015. 26. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Mustar, P. (2009). “Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective”, Research Policy, 38, 1517-1533. 27. Cummins, Jason G. and Kevin A. Hassett (1992). The Effects of Taxation on Investment: New Evidence From Firm Level Panel Data, National Tax Journal, Vol.45, No.3, pp: 243-5 28. Czarnitzki, D. and C.L. Bento (2012). Value for Money? New Microeconometric Evidence on Public R&D Grants in Flanders, Brussels: IWT Studies. 29. Cappelen, A., A. Raknerud and M. Rybalka, (2007). The effect of R&D tax credits on firm performance. Report 2007/22. Statistics Norway: Oslo. 30. Cappelen, A., A. Raknerud and M. Rybalka, (2008), The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Discussion Paper No. 565/2008. Statistics Norway: Oslo. 31. Cunningham, P;Gök,A and Larédo,Ph(2016).Theimpact of direct support to R&D and innovation in firms , handbook of innovation policy impact. 32. Czarnitzki, D., Lopes-Bento, C. (2011). “Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany”, CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper Series 2011-42. 33. Colombo, M. G., L. Grilli and S. Murtinu, (2011). R&D subsidies and the performance of high-tech start-ups. Economics Letters. (112):97-99. 34. Dalberg Global Development Advisors. (2011).Report on Support to SMEs in Developing Countries Through Financial Intermediaries. 35. Duguet, E.(2012).The Effect Of The Incremental R&D Tax Credit On The Private Funding Of R&D: An Econometric Evaluation On French Firm Level Data. available at https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00674546. 36. Dechezleprêtre,A. Einiö,E. Martin,R. Nguyen. K.T. and Reenen J. V.(2016).Do Tax Incentives for Research Increase Firm Innovation? An RD Design for R&D. Centre for Economic Performance. 37. Dumont.M.(2013). The impact of subsidies and fiscal incentives on corporate R&D expenditures in Belgium.Federal Planning Bureau. 38. Eliadis F P, Hill M M, Howlett M, (2005). "Intorduction", in Designing government: from instruments to governance Eds F P Eliadis, M M Hill, M Howlett, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, pp 3-18 39. Edler, J ., Shapira ,Ph.,Cunningham.p., Gök ,A.(2016). Evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention. Hadbook of innovation policy impact. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 40. Eshima, Y. (2003). Impact of public policy on innovative SMEs in Japan. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 85-93. 41. Falk, R. (2007). “Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities: Survey evidence from Austria”, Research Policy, 36, 665-679 42. Falk, R., J. Borrmann, N. Grieger, E. Neppl-Oswald and U. Weixlbaumer (2009). Evaluation of Government Funding in RTDI from a Systems Perspective in Austria, Report 4: Tax Incentive Schemes for R&D, Vienna: Austrian Institute for Economic Research. 43. Falk, R. (2006), “Behavioural additionality of Austria’s industrial research promotion fund (FFF)”, in: OECD (Ed.), Government R&D funding and company behaviour: measuring behavioural additionality. OECD Publishing: Paris. 44. Fombassoa, G, E and Cincerab,M.(2016). The Effect of Subsidies on R&D Investment and Success – Do Subsidy History and Size Matter?. International Centre for Innovation Technology and Education. 45. Fernandez-Ribas, A. and P. Shapira (2009). ‘The role of national and regional innovation programmes in stimulating international cooperation in innovation’, International Journal of Technology Management, 48, 473–498. 46. Gelabert, L., A. Fosfuri and J.A. Tribo (2009). ‘Does the effect of public support for R&D depend on the degree of appropriability?’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 57, 736–767. 47. Georghiou, L., Clarysse, B. 2006. Introduction and synthesis, in: OECD (Ed.), Government R&D funding and company behaviour: Measuring behavioural additionality, OECD Publishing, Paris, pp. 9-38. 48. Goolsbee, Austan. 1997. Investment tax incentives, prices and the supply of capital goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(1): 121-48. 49. Guceri,I.(2016).Will the real R&D employees please stand up? Effects of tax breaks on firm level outcomes ,Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation, Working paper series. 50. Guceri, I., & Liu, L. (2015) .‘Effectiveness of fiscal incentives for R&D: quasi-experimental evidence’, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. 51. Guellec, D. and van Pottelsberghe, B. (2003) .The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and NewTechnologies 12(3): 225-244. 52. Grilli, L. and S. Murtinu (2012). ‘Do public subsidies affect the performance of new technology based firms? The importance of evaluation schemes and agency goals’, Prometheus, 30, 97–111. 53. Guellec, D. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2003). ‘The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12, 225–243. 54. Hall, B.H. (1993). ‘R&D tax policy during the eighties: Success or failure?’, Tax Policy and the Economy, 7, 1–36. 55. Hewitt-Dundas, N. and S. Roper (2010). ‘Output additionality of public support for innovation: Evidence for Irish manufacturing plants’, European Planning Studies, 18, 107–122. 56. Hujer, R. and D. Radic´ (2005). ‘Evaluating the impacts of subsidies on innovation activities in Germany’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 565–586. 57. Herrera, L. and E.R. Bravo Ibarra (2010). ‘Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size’, Intangible Capital, 6, 272–299. 58. Huang,Ch,&Yang,Ch.(2009).Tax Incentives and R&D Activity: Firm-Level Evidence from Taiwan,Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series 102. 59. Hand,C, L.(2012). Public Policy Design and Assumptions About Human Behavior, Western Political Science Association’s Annual Conference, Arizona State University. 60. Haegeland, Torbjørn and Jarle Møen. (2007). Input additionality in the Norwegian R&D tax credit scheme. report 2007/47, Statistics Norway. 61. IMF, OECD, UN AND WORLD BANK (2015).Options for Low Income Countries’ Effective and Efficient Use of Tax Incentives for Investment . A report to the G-20 development working group. 62. Kazan, H.,Baydar,M(2014).R&D Expenditures, New Product Introductions, and Sales Performance with Application to the Furniture Industry International Journal of Operations and Logistics Management,Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Pages: 30-41 . 63. Kizim, N. A. & Kasyanova, L. V. (2012). Classification of Tools of Tax Incentives of Innovations [Klasyfikatsiya instrumentiv podatkovogo stymuljuvannja innovatsiy] // Problemy ekonomiky, 4, pp. 23-29. 64. Klette, Tor Jakob & Møen, Jarle, (2011). "R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: A theoretical analysis and a microeconometric study," Discussion Papers 2011/15, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science. 65. Köhler,Ch.,Laredo,PhandRammer,Ch.(2012).The Impact and Effectiveness of Fiscal Incentives for R&D Nesta Working Paper No. 12/01. 66. Ladinska,G,E .,Non,M and Straathof,B.(2015). More R&D with tax incentives? A meta-analysis. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis . 67. Lach, S. (2002) .Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics 50(4): 369-390. 68. Lerner, J. (1999). The Government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72, 285-318. 69. Link, A., & Scott, J. (2013). Public R&D subsidies, outside private support, and employment growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22, 537-550 70. Liu, P. and Tsai, C. (2007), The Influence of Innovation Management on New Product Development Performance in Taiwan’s Hi-Tech Industries. Research Journal of Business Management, 1: 20-29. 71. Lokshin, B. and Mohnen, P. (2013). Do r&d tax incentives lead to higher wages for r&d workers? evidence from the netherlands. Research Policy, 42(3):823 – 830. 72. Liakhovets,O(2014).Tax Incentives Effectiveness for the Innovation Activity of Industrial Enterprizes in Ukraine, Economics & Sociology, Vol. 7, No 1, 2014, pp. 72-84. 73. Lokshin, B. and Mohnen, P. (2012). How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. Applied Economics, 44(12):1527–1538. 74. Mamuneas, T.P. and M.I. Nadiri (1996). ‘Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries’, Journal of Public Economics, 63, 57–81. 75. Mamuneas, T.P. (1999). ‘Spillovers from publicly financed R&D capital in high-tech 76. industries’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 215–239. 77. Meeusen, W. and Janssens, W. (2001). Substitution versus additionality: econometric evaluation by means of micro-economic data of the efficacy and efficiency of R&D subsidies to firms in the Flemish region. CESIT Discussion paper No 2001/01, University of Antwerp. 78. Mulkay, B. and J. Mairesse (2013). ‘The R&D tax credit in France: Assessment and ex ante evaluation of the 2008 reform’, Oxford Economic Papers, 65 (3), 746–766. 79. OECD (2002).Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, 6th edn, Paris: OECD. 80. Ozcelik, E. and E. Taymaz (2008). ‘R&D support programs in developing countries: The Turkish experience’, Research Policy, 37, 258–275. 81. Parsons, M. (2011). Rewarding Innovation: Improving Federal Tax Support for Business R&D in Canada, C.D. Howe Institute, No. 334: September, pp. 1-23. 82. ørensen, A., Kongsted, H.C. and Marcusson, M. (2003) .R&D, public innovation policy, and productivity: the case of Danish manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12(2): 163-178. 83. Radicic,D. Pugh, G. Hollanders, H. Wintjes, Rene and Fairburn, Jon.(2015). The impact of innovation support programs on small and medium enterprises innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: An evaluation for seven European Union regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 84. Schneider, C. and R. Veugelers (2010).‘On young highly innovative companies: Why they matter and how(not) to policy support them’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 969–1007. 85. Sandelowski, M., and Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer. 86. Stemler, Steve (2001).AN over view of content analysis.Practical Assessment,Research & Evaluation, Vol7 (17). 87. Salamon L M, (2002). "The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction", in The tools of government: a guide to the new governance Eds L M Salamon, O V Elliott, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1-47 88. Sissoko.a.(2013). R&D subsidies and firm-level exports: evidence from france.UCL. 89. Song ,J. G.(2007). The impact of fiscal incentives for R&D investment in Korea. OECD_TIP. 90. Technopolic Group & Mioir (2012). Evaluation of Innovation Activities. Guidance on methods and practices. Study funded by the European Commission, Directorate for Regional Policy. 91. Teirlinck, P. and A. Spithoven (2012). ‘Fostering industry–science cooperation through public funding: Differences between universities and public research centres’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 37 (5), 676–695. 92. United Nations,)2000(. Tax Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment,A Global Survey, Geneva, ASIT Advisory Studies.No. 16. 93. Wallsten, S. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 82-100. 94. Zimmer , L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), .318-311Seyed KamalVaezimehrdadjavaherdashti3172020274010.66224/jivc.6552.8.15.27http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/6552http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6552http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6552http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6552http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6552http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6552http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6552http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6552همراز‌، ویدا؛ 1379 ، نهادهای فرهنگی در حکومت رضاشاه‌، مجله تاریخ معاصر‌ایران‌، (1)1، ص 54 2. روحبخش، رحیم. 1392، شورایی به قدمت 110 سال. نشریه رشد آموزش تاریخ، (52)15 ، ص 20 3.سایت رسمی مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی،1397، قانون تاسیس شورای مرکزی دانشگاه ها، مصوب سال 1344، بخش قوانین و مقررات 4.سایت رسمی مرکز اسناد شورای عالی آموزش و پرورش، 1397 5.سایت رسمی مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 1397، قانون تاسیس وزارت علوم و آموزش عالی مصوب سال 1346، بخش قوانین و مقررات 6.سایت رسمی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، 1396 ، شرح وظایف وتاریخچه‌ی دفتر گسترش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی 7.احمدی، وحید. 1394، ضرورت ها و الزامات تدوین سیاست¬های اجرایی و اولویت های پژوهش و فناوری کشور، دبیرخانه شورای عالی علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، ص 7 8.جلال آبادی، اسدالله و طاهری، افسانه؛ 1383 ، شاخص های مهم تحقیقاتی در ایران و جهان، نشریه رهیافت، (33) 14 ، ص 2 9.سایت رسمی شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی، 1397 ، تاریخچه شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی 10.سایت رسمی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، 1396، شرح وظایف و تاریخچه‌ی دفتر گسترش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی 11.سایت رسمی شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی، ۲۰۰۷ ،تاریخچه شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی 12.سایت رسمی شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی، ۲۰۰۷ ، اهداف و وظایف شورا 13.سایت رسمی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، 1396 شرح وظایف و تاریخچه‌ی دفتر گسترش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی 14.سایت رسمی مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نطام، 1397 ، تاریخچه 15.دبیرخانه شورای عالی عتف 1397، معرفی شورا 16.سایت معاونت علمی و فناوری ریاست جمهوری، 1397 17.سایت رسمی مرکز الگوی اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت، 1397 ، بخش اهداف و وظایف مرکز، 18.سایت رسمی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، 1397، آئین نامه شورای عالی برنامه ریزی آموزش عالی، دفتر برنامه ریزی آموزش عالی 19.سایت رسمی مجلس شورای اسلامی، اداره کمیسیون ها، 1397 20.سایت رسمی سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور، 1397 21.سایت رسمی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، 1397 ، تاریخچه، 22.سایت رسمی وزارت بهداشت، درمان و آموزش پزشکی، 1397 23.سایت رسمی وزارت صنعت، معدن و تجارت، 1397، بخش چشم انداز و ماموریت¬ها، syamaknouriyazdanmoradi3172020415810.66224/jivc.6553.8.15.41http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/6553http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6553http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6553http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6553http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6553http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6553http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6553http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/65531. الیاسی، مهدی، کزازی، ابوالفضل، محمدی، مهدی(1390). بررسی تاثیر تنظیم محیط نهادی بر اثر بخشی همکاری‌‎های فناورانه در صنایع هوافضایی کشور با تاکید بر نقش سازمان‌های میانجی. نشریه بهبود مدیریت، دوره 5، شماره 2، 139-158. 2. انصاری، رضا(1391). همکاری‌های فناورانه؛ مفاهیم کلیدی و عوامل موفقیت. فصلنامه تخصصی رشد فناوری، 8(30). 3. امین بیدختی، علی اکبر، نعمتی، محمد علی، رضایی، علی محمد، محمدحسینی، سید احمد(1396). طراحی مدلی به منظورتحلیل سطح همکاری دانشگاه و صنعت با استفاده از مدل سازی ساختاری تفسیری(ISM). فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، 6(11). 4. دهقانی، امراله، حسینی، هادی(1396). موانع و چالش‌های اجرایی در فرآیند همکاری ‏های فناورانه (موردمطالعه: حوزه فناوری نانو ). فصلنامه توسعه تکنولوژی صنعتی، 15(30)، 59-64. 5. رفسنجانی نژاد، سیما(1396). ابزار پیشبرد همکاری‌های فناورانه و اقتصاد دانش بنیان. نظام نامه پیوست فناوری. 6. شفیعی، مسعود، آراسته، حمیدرضا(1383).همکاری دانشگاه و صنعت. 7. شفیعی، مسعود، یزدانیان، وحید(1386). توسعه مفهومی ارتباط بین صنعت و دانشگاه: از رهیافت‌های عملگرا تا رهیافت‌های نهادگرا. فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 9(36) ، 81-110. 8. شیری، حامد(1394). بررسی رابطه دانشگاه با صنعت و چالش‌های آن: پژوهشی کیفی در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه تهران. نشریه صنعت و دانشگاه، 8(29و30)، 1-10. 9. صفری، سعید، قاضی زاده، مصطفی، طاهری، رضا(1392). بررسی موانع ارتباط اعضای هیأت علمی با بخش صنعت در راستای تحقق دانشگاه کارآفرین. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی، دوره 5، 5-5. 10. صمدی میارکلایی، حمزه، صمدی میارکلایی، حسین(1392). نظریه‌ها و الگوهای ارتباط میان دانشگاه‌ها و صنعت در اقتصاد دانش بنیان. نشریه رشد فناوری، دوره 9، شماره 35، 59-70. 11. مقیمی، سیدمحمد(1383). کارآفرینی در نهادهای جامعه مدنی(جلد دوم). تهران: موسسه انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران و مرکز کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران. 12. مطهر، سیدهومن(1391). شناسایی عوامل موثر بر کسب مزیت رقابتی در کسب و کارهای کوچک و متوسط و رتبه بندی آنها (پایان نامه چاپ نشده کارشناسی ارشد). دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان. 13. مطهری نژاد، میرزابابا(1388). ارتباط دانشگاه و صنعت اسم رمز توسعه ملی. مجموعه مقالات سیزدهمین کنگره سراسری همکاری‌های دولت، دانشگاه و صنعت برای توسعه ملی، 130. 14. نوری، سیامک، مرادی، یزدان(1396). بررسی روش‌های تعامل و همکاری بین دانشگاه و صنایع کوچک و متوسط. دومین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت و حسابداری. تهران: موسسه آموزش عالی صالحان. 15. یعقوبی فرانی، احمد، حاتمی‌کیا، نازنین (1394). موانع همکاری دانشگاه و صنعت از دیدگاه استادان دانشگاه‌های بوعلی سینا و صنعتی همدان. نامه آموزش عالی، 8(32)، 31-51. 16. Ashino, R. (2004). Establishing trust during the formation of technology alliances [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (2), 187-202.‏ 17. Anderson, M. (2000). University-Industry Partnerships. Higher Education in the Unites States: An Encyclopedia; Edited by James Forest and Kevin Kinser, ABC-CLIO: Santa Barbara California.‏ 18. Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31 (3), 387-408.‏ 19. Bjerregaard, T. (2009). Universities-industry collaboration strategies: a micro-level perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12 (2), 161-176.‏ 20. Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research policy, 39 (7), 858-868.‏ 21. Buganza, T., Colombo, G., & Landoni, P. (2014). Small and medium enterprises' collaborations with universities for new product development: An analysis of the different phases. Journal of small business and Enterprise Development, 21(1), 69-86.‏ 22. Chau, V. S., Gilman, M., & Serbanica, C. (2017). Aligning university–industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 199-209.‏ 23. Comacchio, A., Bonesso, S., & Pizzi, C. (2012). Boundary spanning between industry and university: the role of Technology Transfer Centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37 (6), 943-966.‏ 24. Dierdonck, R Van., Debackere, K., & Engelen, B. (1990). University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it? Research Policy, 19 (6), 551-566.‏ 25. Dooley, L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10 (3), 316-332.‏ 26. Fukugawa, N (2005). Characteristics of knowledge interactions between universities and small firms in Japan. International Small Business Journal, 23 (4), 379-401.‏ 27. Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, D., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & Martin, D. P (2017). Influence of university–firm governance on SMEs innovation and performance levels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 250-261.‏ 28. Goduscheit, R. C., & Knudsen, M. P. (2015). How Barriers to Collaboration Prevent Progress in Demand for Knowledge: A Dyadic Study of Small and Medium‐Sized Firms, Research and Technology Organizations and Universities. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24 (1), 29-54.‏ 29. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Press.#‏ 30. Jones, J., & de Zubielqui, G. C. (2017). Doing well by doing good: A study of university- industry interactions, innovationess and firm performance in sustainability-oriented Australian SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 262-270.‏ 31. Karlsson, J., Booth, S., & Odenrick, P. (2007). Academics' strategies and obstacles in achieving collaboration between universities and SMEs. Tertiary Education and Management, 13 (3), 187-201.‏ 32. Katila, R., & Mang, P. Y. (2003). Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations. Research policy, 32 (2), 317-332.‏ 33. Lin, J. Y. (2017). Balancing industry collaboration and academic innovation: The contingent role of collaboration-specific attributes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 216-228.‏ 34. Nummela, N. (2003). Looking through a prism—multiple perspectives to commitment to international R&D collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14 (1), 135-148.‏ 35. Pickernell, D., Clifton, N., & Senyard, J. (2009). Universities, SMEs and innovation frameworks: Think global, act local? Industry and Higher Education, 23 (2), 79-89.‏ 36. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research policy, 37 (8), 1205-1223.‏zahragomarmohsenhamedirezabandarian3172020597410.66224/jivc.6554.8.15.59http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/6554http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6554http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6554http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6554http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6554http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6554http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6554http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/65541. حسینی، سيد علی؛ محمدی، مهدي، حاجی حسینی، حجت اله؛ (1395)، عوامل حیاتی موفقیت نوآوری در محصولات و سیستمهای پیچیده، فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، دوره سوم، شماره 5، صص 159-186 2. حيدري، علي، جعفر پناه، اسماعيل،(1395)، ارائه مدلي براي اهرم سازي يك شايستگي فناورانه( مورد مطالعه: ربات مار مانند)، فصلنامه نوآوري و ارزش آفريني، جلد 5، شماره 9، صص 83-100 3. صفدری رنجبر، م، رحمان سرشت، ح، منطقی، من، قاضی نوری، س، ، ا؛ 1395، پیشران های کسب و ایجاد قابلیت های فناورانه ساخت محصولات و سامانه های پیچیده در بنگاه های متاخر، مطالعه موردی شرکت توربوکمپرسور نفت، فصلنامه مدیریت نوآوری، سال پنجم، شماره 3،صص 1-26 کیامهر، م، 1392، توانمندی های فناورانه عرضه کالاهای سرمایه ای پیچیده در کشورهای در حال توسعه: مطالعه موردی یک شرکت در صنعت برقابی ایران، فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری، سال ششم، شماره 1 5. روسي مختار زاده، نيما، زماني، محمود، گشتاسبي، محمد، بررسي تاثير توانمندي يكپارچه سازي دانش بر نوآوري فناورانه و عملكرد راهبردي(مورد مطالعه: بنگاه هاي توليد كننده دارو در ايران)، فصلنامه نوآوري و ارزش آفريني ، دوره 5، شماره 10 6. Andriopoulos, C., Lewis, M.W. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20 (4), 696-717. 7. Benner, M. J., Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256. 8. Bergek. A, Tell. F, Berggren. C and Watson. J. (2008). Technological capabilities and late shakeouts: Industrial dynamics in the advanced gas turbine industry, 1987- 2002, Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 17, Number 2, pp. 335–392 9. Bergek. A, Berggren. C and Tell. F. (2009). Do technology strategies matter? A comparison of two electrical engineering corporations, 1988–1998 electrical engineering corporations, 1988–1998 Technology Analysis & strategic management, Volume 21, 2009 - Issue 4, pp:445-470 10. Bergek. A, Berggren. Christian. C, Magnusson. T and Hobday.M.2013. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Research Policy, 42 (6‐7), 1210–1224 11. Blum. M. (2004). Product Development as Dynamic Capability, PHD thesis, University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich 12. Brady, T., Davies, A. (2014), Managing structural and dynamic complexity: a tale of two projects, Project Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 4, 21–38 13. Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M.Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 207-218. 14. Davies, A. (1997), ‘The life cycle of a complex product system,’ International Journal of Innovation Management, 1 (3), 229–256. 15. Davies, A. and Brady, T. (2000). ‘Organizational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions’, Research Policy, 29, 931–953. 16. Davies, A. and Hobday, M. (2005), The business of projects (Managing innovation in complex product systems), Cambridge University Press, New York 17. Davies, A, Brady, T, Prencipe, A, 2011, Innovation in complex product and systems: implication for project-based organizing, Advances in Strategic Management, DOI: 10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028005 18. Davies. A, Brady, T, 2015, Explicating the dynamic of project capabilities, International journal of innovation management, IPMA-01767 19. Davies, A, Dodgson, M, 2016, Dynamic capabilities in complex projects: the case of London Heathrow terminal 5, Project management journal, DOI:10.1002/p.m. 20. Dutton, C., Turner, N., Kelly, L., L., (2014), Learning in a programe context: an exploratory investigation of drivers and constrains, International journal of project management 21. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550 22. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121. 23. Grabher, G. ,(2002b), Fragile sector, robust practice: project ecologies in new media’, Environment and Planning A Theme Issue, 34 (11): 1903–2092 24. Guffarth, D., Knappe, M.,(2018), Patterns of Learning in Dynamic Technological System Lifecycles—What Automotive Managers Can Learn from the Aerospace Industry?, Journal of open innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity 25. Hansen, U., E., Lema, R., (2018), the co-evolution of learning mechanisms and technological capabilities: lessons from energy technologies in emerging economies, Technological forecasting and social change 26. He, Z-L., & Wong, P-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494. 27. Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization ,Research Policy, 26, 689–710 28. Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organization: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?, Research Policy 29, 871-893 29. Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15 (1), 70-81. 30. Huang, J., W., Li, Y., H., The mediating role of ambidextrous capability in learning orientation and new product performance, Journal of business and industrial marketing, 32/5 31. Kiamehr, M. (2012), PHD thesis, Sussex university 32. Kiamehr, M, Hobday, Hamedi, M. (2015). Latecomer firms' strategies in complex product systems (CoPS): the case of Iran`s thermal electricity generation system, Research policy, 44, 1240-1251 33. Kiamehr, M, Hobday, (2016), Path of technological capability building in complex capital goods: The case of hydro electricity generation in Iran, Technological forecasting & social change, 34. Kang, S-C., Snell, S.A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 65- 92. 35. Katila, R., G. Ahuja. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and product introductions. Acad. Management J. 45 1183–1194., 36. Lavie, D., L. Rosenkopf. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49 797–818., Li,Y. , Wei, Z, Zhao, Zhang,C., Liu,Y .(2013). ambidextrous organizational learning, environmental munificence and new product performance: Moderating effect of managerial ties in China. Int. J. Production Economics, 146, 95-105 37. Liu, l., Leitner, D. (2012), Simultaneous Pursuit of Innovation and Efficiency in Complex Engineering Projects—A Study of the Antecedents and Impacts of Ambidexterity in Project Teams, Project Management Journal 38. Liu, L., Wang, Sheng. (2012), Achieving ambidexterity in large, complex engineering projects: a case study of the Sutong bridge project, Construction Management and Economics ,30, 399–409 39. Lundin, R. A. and Soderholm, A. (1995). ‘A theory of the temporary organization’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11 (4), 437–455. 40. Magnusson, T., F. Tell, and J. Watson. (2005). From CoPS to Mass production? Capabilities and innovation in power generation equipment manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(1): 1-26. 41. Majid pour, M. (2016), Technological catch-up in complex product systems. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 41: pp. 92-105. 42. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87. 43. Mathews, J. A. (2002c). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19 (4): 467–488. 44. Mulders, D.E.M, (2010), Essays on the nature and dynamics of higher-order organizational capabilities, PHD thesis, University of Technology 45. O’Reilly, Charles A. and Tushman, Michael L. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present and future, Academy of management perspectives, 2013, Vol. 27, Issue 4, Pages 324-338 46. O’Reilly, Charles A. and Tushman, Michael L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28: 185-206. 47. Prencipe, A. (2000). Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in CoPS: the case of the aircraft engine control system. Research Policy 29: 895-911 48. Safdari Ranjbar, M, Rahmanseresht, H, Manteghi, M, Ghazinoory, 2017, Dynamism of Iran’s Government Policies meantime Formation and Evolution of Gas Turbine Industry as a Complex Product System, International conference on management of technology 49. Ranjbar, M,R, Park,T,Y, Kiamehr. M. (2018). What happened to complex product systems literature over the last two decades: progresses so far and path ahead, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Taylor & Francis Group 50. Rothaermel, F. T., D. L. Deeds. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. 25 201–221 51. Rothaermel, F. T., C. W. L. Hill. (2005). Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 16 52–70 52. Rothaermel, Frank T. and Alexandre, Maria T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20: 759-780. 53. Sidhu, J.S., Commandeur, H.R., & Volberda, H.W. (2007). The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18 (1), 20-38. 54. Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (4), 597-624. 55. Tacla, C., L., Figueiredo, P.,N.,(2006), The dynamics of technological learning inside the latecomer firm: evidence from the capital goods industry in Brazil, Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 36, Nos. 1/2/3, 2006 56. Tushman, M., L. (2017). Innovation streams and executive leadership, Research- Technology Management, Online journal management: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/urtm20 57. Teece DJ. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy 15 (6): 285-305. 58. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533. 59. Turner N. (2011), the management of ambidexterity, PHD Thesis, university of BATH 60. Turner, N., Maylor, H., Kelly, L., L., Brady, T., Kutsch, E., Carver, S., (2014), Ambidexterity and knowledge strategy in major projects: a framework and illustrative case study, Project management journal, Vol. 45, No.5 61. Turner, N., Maylor, H., Swart, J., (2014). Ambidexterity in projects: an intellectual capital perspective, International Journal of Project Management 62. Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S.A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 221-231 63. Wei, Z., & Igel, B. (2010). Competence to Manage Innovation in Complex Product Systems, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 2, issue 6, pp: 1741-5098 64. Wang, C., Rafiq.(2012). Ambidextrous Organizational Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High-tech Firms, British Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x 65. Wang, X., R., Liu, L., Sheng, Z.,H.(2009). Ambidextrous management of al large, complex engineering project with significant innovation-case study of the Sutong bridge project, 978-1-4244-3672-9/09/$25.00 ©2009 IEEE 66. Zeng, D., Hu, J., Ouyang, T.,(2017), Managing Innovation Paradox in the Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ambidextrous Capability in a Focal Firm, Sustainability 2017, 9, 2091; doi:10.3390/su9112091 67. Zollo, M., & Winter, S.G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13 (3), 339-351. 68. Yin,K.R.(2014), Case study research design and methods, SAGE, Londonhassannadalipoorkarimifaribamohammad alinadi3172020759210.66224/jivc.6555.8.15.75http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/6555http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6555http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6555http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6555http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6555http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6555http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6555http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6555آراستی، زهرا، ملکی کرم آباد، محمد مهدی، متوسلی، مسعود. (1391). عوامل نهادي تاثيرگذار بر پيدايش فعالیتهاي کارآفرینانه اجتماعی. توسعه کارآفرینی، سال دوم، جلد پنجم، تابستان 1391، از صفحه 203-185. 2.انسلم استراوس و جولیت کربین.(2008). مبانی پژوهش کیفی. ترجمه ابراهیم افشار (1395). انتشارات نی. 3.تمنا، سعید، صمدی، سمیه (1395). رابطه سرمایه فرهنگی و سرمایه اجتماعی با میزان آگاهی دانشجویان از فرهنگ دانشگاهی. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزي در آموزش عالی، دوره 22،شماره1، 1395، 4.بازرگان، عباس.(1395). روش های تحقیق کمی، کیفی و آمیخته. ویراست سوم. انتشارات دیدار. 5.بیرکس، ملانی و جین الیزابت میلز.(2011). تحقیق مبنایی: راهنمای عملی. ویراسته ی هانیه شمس کلاهی. ترجمه ی سیدمحمد اعرابی و عباداله بانشی.( 1393)تهران: دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی. 6.زمانی، اصغر.(1396). شناسایی، تحلیل و اولویت بندی عوامل موثر بر کیفیت آموزش در آموزش عالی. فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، دوره 6،شماره 11 7.عرب، عباس، آهنچیان، محمدرضا، کارشکی، حسین. (1392). نقش سبک رهبری تحولی مدیران در پیش بینی کارآفرینی اجتماعی کارکنان: مطالعه تطبیقی دانشگاه های دولتی با دانشگاههای غیر دولتی مشهد. ابتکارو خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، پاییز 92، دوره سوم، شماره 2. 8.فراستخواه، مقصود. (1395).روش تحقیق کیفی در علوم اجتماعی. انتشارات آگاه. 9. فراستخواه، مقصود. (1396).گاه و بی گاهی دانشگاه در ایران.انتشارات آگاه. 10.فلیک، اوه. (2006). درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی. (ترجمه هادی جلیلی،1391). تهران، نشر نی. 11.گال، مردیت، بورگ والتر و گال، جویس. (2004). روش های تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی. (ترجمه احمدرضا نصر و همکاران،1392) تهران، انتشارات سمت. 12.یادگار، نسیم، معماریانی، محمد مهدی، صدق آمیز، عبدالرضا. (1392). قصد کارآفرینانة اجتماعی: اثر متقابل نگرش کارآفرینانة اجتماعی، امنيت مالی و سرمایة اجتماعی. توسعه كارآفريني، دوره 7، شماره 3، جلد دوم، بهار .1393 13. Alsaaty, F. M., Abrahams, D., & Carter, E. (2014).Business students’ interests in entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship at a historically black institution. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 2, 1–30. 14.Abrams, R. M. (2017). Entrepreneurship: A Real-World Approach. Planning Shop. 15.Andreas, M. R. (2003). Validity and reliability test in case study research: A literature review with “hands-on applications for each research phase, Qualitative Market Research, 6 (2), 75-86. 16.Choi, N., and S. Majumdar. 2014. “Social Entrepreneurship as an Essentially Contested Concept: Opening a New Avenue for Systematic Future Research.” Journal of Business Venturing 29 (3): 363–376. 17.Dees, G. (1998). The meaning of social ntrepreneurship. Kauffman center for entrepreneurial 18.Dobele, L. (2016). A New Approach in Higher Education: Social Entrepreneurship Education. Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21st Century, 227. 19.Granados, M. L., V. Hlupic, E. Coakes, and S. Mohamed. 2011. “Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship Research and Theory.” Social Enterprise Journal 7 (3): 198–218. 20. Kearney, C., Hisrich, R. D., & Roche, F. W. (2010). Change management through entrepreneurship in public sector enterprises. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15(04), 415-437.‏ 21.Kirby, David. (2011). the case for (social) entrepreneurship education in Egyptian universities. Education ‏ Training 53 (5), pp, 403-415. 22. López, S. T. Calvo, J. V. P. & García, J. H. (2014). Service-learning as Training for Social Entrepreneurship: An Experience in the University. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,139, 504-511. 23. Lubberink, R., Blok, V., van Ophem, J., van er Velde, G., & Omta, O. (2017). Innovation for Society: Towards a Typology of Developing Innovations by Social Entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1-27.‏ 24.Newth, J., and C. Woods.) 2014(. “Resistance to Social Entrepreneurship: How Context Shapes Innovation.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 5 (2): 192–213. 25. Pache, A. C., & Chowdhury, I. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 494-510.‏ 26. Peredo, A. M., and M. McLean. 2006. “Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review of the Concept.” Journal of World Business 41 (1): 56–65. 27. Punch, K. F., & Oancea, A. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. Sage.‏ 28. Rosendahl L., Randolph H., Sloof M.V.)2012).: The effect of early entrepreneurship education: Evidence froma randomized field experiment, Tinbergen Instıtute Discussion Papers. p. 40. 29. Salamzadeh,Aidin,Azimi, Mohammad Ali, (2013). Social entrepreneurship education in higher education: insights from a developing country. Int. J. Entrepreneurship an SmallBusiness, Vol. 20, No. 1. 30. Sassmannshausen, S. P., and C. Volkmann. )2016(. “The Scientometrics of Social Entrepreneurship and Its Establishment as an Academic Field.” Journal of Small Business Management 1–23.aliakbarsherafatinejadmojtabasajadihamidrezaghasemisheilashahidimostafaalimiriahmadmousavi 31720209310810.66224/jivc.6556.8.15.93http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/6556http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6556http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6556http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6556http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6556http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6556http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/6556http://journalie.ir/fa/Article/Download/65561. اکبرزاده، زین‏العادین و همکاران، شاخص‏های چابکی‌ سازمانی ‌با ‌استفاده ‌از‌ تکنيك ‌تصميم‏گيری‌ ارزیابی چند معيارۀ فازی، فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش‏آفرینی دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، بهار 1394. 2. محمدی حسینی، سید احمد و همکاران، بررسی نقش یادگیری سازمانی در افزایش عملکرد نوآوری، فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش‏آفرینی دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، بهار 1393. 3. یدالهی، جهانگیر و همکاران؛ عزیزی زیارت، امید؛ خواستار، حمزه (1388). "بررسی رابطه بین ساختار و کارآفرینی سازمانی"، توسعه کارآفرینی، 2(3):55-80. 4. نصر اصفهانی، علی و همکاران، (1395). "بررسی تأثیر ظرفیت جذب دانش بر کارآفرینی سازمانی"، توسعه کارآفرینی، 9(2):377-395. 5. وکیلی، یوسف و همکاران، (1395)، "تبیین نقش اشتراک دانش بر دوسوتوانی سازمانی: نقش میانجی ظرفیت جذب شرکت"، توسعه کارآفرینی، 9(3):573-591. 6. Antoncic, Bostjan. Hisrich, Robert. (2001). “Entrepreneurship: Construct refinement and cross- cultural validation”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16:1, PP 495- 527. 7. Awasthi, Dinesh. (2011). “Approaches to entrepreneurship development: The Indian experience”, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 1:2, PP 107-123 8. Belousova, Olga. Gailly, Benoît. Basso, Olivier. (2010). “A conceptual model of corporate entrepreneurial behavior (Interactive paper)”, Journal of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30:17, PP 1- 14. 9. Burgelman, Robert A. (2014). “Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study”, Management Science, 29:12, PP 1349-1364. 10. Chua, Alton. Lam, Wing. (2005). “Why KM projects fail: a multi-case analysis”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9:3, 6-17. 11. Chen, Jin. Zhu, Zhaohui. Anquan, Wang. (2005). “A system model for corporate entrepreneurship”, International Journal of Manpower, 26:6, PP 529- 543 12. Choonwoo, Lee. Kyungmook, Lee. Pennings, Johannes M. (2004). “Internal capabilities, external linkages, and performance: a study on technology-based Korean ventures”. 13. Colabi, Amir. Mohammad. Khajeheian, Datis. (2018). “Strategic renewal in corporate entrepreneurship context”. 14. Cornwall, Jeffrey R. Perlman, Baron. (1990). “Organizational entrepreneurship”. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. 15. Fry, Fred L. (1993). “Entrepreneurship: A planning approach”, United States: South-Western Educational Publisher. 16. Fu-Lai Yu, Tony. (2001). “Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial state”, International Journal of Social Economics, 28:9, PP 7-14 17. Heinonen, Jarna. Korvela, Kaisu. (2003). “How about measuring entrepreneurship”, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration. Turku, Finland, PP 1-18. 18. Hindle, Kevin. (2010). “Skillful dreaming: testing a general model of entrepreneurial process with a specific narrative of venture creation”, An Issue about The Republic of Tea, 97. 19. Hisrich, Robert. (2005). “Entrepreneurship”, Boston": McGraw-Hill Publisher. 20. Hornsby, Jeffrey S. Kuratko, Donald F. Shepherd, Dean A. Bott, Jennifer P. (2009). “Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions: examining perception and position”, Journal of Business Venturing, 24:3, PP 236-247. 21. Hurley, Amy E. (1999). “Incorporating feminist theories in to sociological theories of entrepreneurship”, Women in management review, 14:2, PP 2-7. 22. Kearney, Claudine. Hisrich, Robert. Roche, Frank. (2008). “A conceptual model of public sector corporate entrepreneurship”, International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 4:1, PP 295-313. 23. Kuratko, Donald F. Hornsby, Jeffrey S. Bishop, James W. (2005). “Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions and job satisfaction”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1:2, PP 275- 291. 24. Kuratko, Donald F. Ireland, R. Duane. Covin, Jeffrey G. Hornsby, Jeffrey S. (2005). “A model of middle-level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior”, Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice, 29:6, PP 699-716. 25. Kuratko, Donald F. (2007). “Corporate entrepreneurship”, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3:2, PP1-65. 26. Marques, Carla Susana. Ferreria, João. (2009). “SME innovation capacity, competitive advantage and performance in a traditional industrial region of Portugal”, J. Technol. Manage. Innovat, 4, PP 53-68. 27. Miller, Danny. Friesen, Peter H. (1982). “Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum”, Strategic Management Journal, 1, PP 1-25. 28. Miles, Morgan P. Munilla, Linda S. Darroch, Jenny. (2009). “Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship”, Journal of International Entrepreneurship and Management, 5:1, PP 65- 76. 29. Philpott, Kevin. Dooley, Lawrence. O’Reilly, Caroline. Lupton, Gary. (2011). “The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions”, Technovation, 31, PP 161-170. 30. Prince, Yvonne M. Hessels, S. Jolanda A. Verhoeven, Wim H.J. (2004). “Factors influencing export development of Dutch manufactured products”, Business & Policy Research, Zoetermeer. 31. Sakhdari, Kamal. Burgers, Henri. Davidsson, Per. (2014). “Capable but not able: the effect of institutional context and search breadth on the absorptive capacity-corporate entrepreneurship relationship”, Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship research exchange conference proceedings. Queensland University of Technology, PP 1-21. 32. Sakhdari, Kamal. Burgers J. Henri. (2018). “The moderating role of entrepreneurial management in the relationship between absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship: an attention-based view”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 14:4, 927-950. 33. Sakhdari Kamal. Jalali Bidakhavidi Erfan. (2016). “Underground innovation: How to encourage Bootlegging employees to disclose their good ideas”, Technology Innovation Management Review, 6:3, PP 5-12. 34. Scheepers, M., Hough, J., Bloom. J. (2008). “Nurturing the corporate entrepreneurship capability”, Journal of Southern African Business Review, 12:3, PP 87- 119. 35. Stevenson, Howard H. Roberts, Michael. Grousbeck, Harold Irving. (1985). “New business ventures and the entrepreneur”, Homewood: Irwin. 36. Stoner, James F. Freeman, R. Edward. Gilbert, Daniel R (1995). “Management”, New York: Prentice-Hall Publishers. 37. Ucbasaran, Deniz. Westhead, Paul. Wright, Mike. (2001). “The focus of entrepreneurial research: Contextual and process issues”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25:4, PP 57- 80. 38. Wang, Wenjun. Lu, Wei. Kent Millington, John. (2011). “Determinants of entrepreneurial intention among college students in China and US”, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 1:1, PP 35-44. 39. Wiklund, Johan. Patzelt, Holger. Shepherd Dean A. (2009). “Building an integrative model of small business growth,” Small Business Economics, 32:4, 351-374. 40. Ziyae, Babak. (2018). “Presenting a model of corporate entrepreneurship with corporate approach”, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14:4, 342-352.