امکان‌سنجیِ استقرار رشته برنامه‌درسی محیط کار در دانشگاه‌های ایران
محورهای موضوعی : روش های نوین آموزش وتوسعه منابع انسانی
زهرا پورجعفریان
1
,
کورش فتحی واجارگاه
2
*
,
سعید صفایی موحد
3
,
سیده مریم حسینی لرگانی
4
1 - گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
3 - شرکت ملی نفت ایران
4 - گروه نوآوری آموزشی و درسی، موسسه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی
کلید واژه: مطالعات برنامه‌درسی, امکان‌سنجی, برنامه‌درسی محیط کار,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش بررسی امکانِ استقرارِ رشته برنامه‌درسی محیط کار در دانشگاه‌های ایران است. این پژوهش در پیِ پاسخ‌گویی به این سوال است: آیا می‌توان در دانشگاه رشته‌ای به عنوان ِ برنامه‌درسی محیط کار برای تربیت متخصصان این رشته ایجاد کرد؟ پژوهش حاضر با توجه به هدف، ماهیت و امکاناتِ اجرایی در گروه پژوهش‌های کیفی قرار دارد. برای اجرای پژوهش از مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختار یافته با ده نفر از متخصصان برنامه‌درسی محیط کار استفاده شد. با توجه به تمرکز این پژوهش بر برنامه‌درسی محیط کار روش نمونه‌گیری ملاک‌محور در این پژوهش مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. بررسی اطلاعاتِ مصاحبه‌ها با کمک روش تحلیل مضمون انجام شد. براساس یافته‌ها، نظرات متخصصان در پاسخ به موضوعِ «ضرورتِ استقرارِ رشته در دانشگاه» در سه دسته مضمونیِ «عوامل مرتبط با رشته مطالعات برنامه‌درسی»، «عوامل مرتبط با رشته‌ها و زمینه‌های مشابه» و «عوامل مرتبط با محیط کار» قرار گرفت. در ادامه با تحلیل مضمونِ پاسخ متخصصان در پاسخ به موضوعِ «پیش‌شرط‌های لازم برای استقرار رشته» دو دسته مضمونیِ «شرایط اجرایی»، «شرایط علمی» و مضامین فرعی هریک معرفی شدند. در پایان نقش‌ها و توانمندی‌های فارغ‌التحصیلان رشته برنامه‌درسی محیط کار مورد بررسی قرار گرفت.
Abstract The present research aims at investigating the feasibility of establishing the workplace curriculum in Iranian universities. This research seeks to answer the following question: Is it possible to establish the workplace curriculum field at the Iranian universities to train specialists in this field? The present study is qualitative research in terms of the purpose, nature, and implementation facilities. Semi-structured interviews with ten workplace curriculum specialists were used to conduct the research. Since this research focuses on the workplace curriculum, the critical case sampling method was used in this research. The information of the interviews was analyzed using the content analysis method. Based on the findings, the opinions of workplace curriculum specialists were categorized into three groups of proponents, conditional proponents, and opponents of establishing this field. Then, the roles and capabilities of the workplace curriculum graduates and their expected competencies were identified. Based on the finding of the research,the opinion of the education specialists in response to the necessity of establishing a field at university are divided into three thematic categories as "factors related to the field of curriculum studies", "factors related to similar fields and university majors" and "factors related to the workplace".Then, by analyzing the content of the experts' opinion in response to the topic of "preconditions necessary for the establishment of university field", two thematic categories of "executive conditions", "scientific conditions" and sub-themes were introduced. At the end, the roles , abilities and competencies of the graduates were examined.
1- Fathivajargah,K. Moving Beyond Reconceptualisation,Toward Recontextualisation / Multicontextualisation of Curriculum Studies in Iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies Vol.9, No.18,45 -69.
2-Fathivajargah,K. Moving Beyond Reconceptualisation,Toward Recontextualisation / Multicontextualisation of Curriculum Studies in Iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies Vol.9, No.18,45 -69.
3- Fathivajargah,K. Moving Beyond Reconceptualisation,Toward Recontextualisation / Multicontextualisation of Curriculum Studies in Iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies Vol.9, No.18,45 -69.
4- Billett S. Towards a model of workplace learning: The learning curriculum. Studies in continuing education. 1996 Jan 1;18(1):43-58.
5- Moore DT. Curriculum at work. Journal of workplace learning. 2004 Sep 1.
6- Solomon N, Boud D, Leontios M, Staron M. Researchers are learners too: collaboration in research on workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2001 Dec 1.
7- Fathivajargah K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. Tehran: Elmostadan;2020.
8- Fathivajargah,K. Moving Beyond Reconceptualisation,Toward Recontextualisation / Multicontextualisation of Curriculum Studies in Iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies Vol.9, No.18,45 -69.
9- Safaemovahed S. Heutagogy- based Workplace Curriculum Development Model (HWCDM). Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S)Vol. 13 (51); 2019, 5-26.
10- Roodi M, Fathi vajargah K, Arefi M, hakimzadeh R, sharifi M. Conceptualizing curriculum counseling as a new domain in the field of curriculum studies. CSTP. 2018; 6 (11) :105-140
11- Mehmandoust Ghamsari Z S, Fathi vajargah K, Khorasani A, Safaemovahed, S. Design aWorkplace Curriculum Model: A Research Synthesis. Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum. Vol.16 (8); 2021, 5-40
12-MehmandoostGhamsari Z S, Fathi Vajargah K, Khorasani A, Safayi Movahed S. Identification and Validation of Effective Factors on the Establishment of Workplace Curriculum Model Emphasizing on Economic Development Consequences. IUESA. 2019; 7 (25) :63-79
13- Fathivajargah K, Khorasani A, Doosti H. Workplace Curriculum. 2016. Tehran: Iran Industrial Training and Research Center Publications.
14- Doosti H. Investigating and analyzing the dominant discourses on the workplace curriculum in Iranian organizations[dissertation]. Shahid Beheshi University,Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology; 2018.501 p.
15-Farzad Nia F, Safaee Movahed S, Ali Asgari M. Presenting a Framework for Human Resources Training and Development in Iranian Complex Projects . Human Resource Management in Oil Industry. 2016; 7 (28) :131-146.
16- Fathivajargah K. The dominant discourses of the workplace curriculum in education and human resource creation; Trends and Assumptions. Third National Conference on Training and Development of Human Resources, Milad Tower, Tehran.(2015).
17- Patton MQ. Qualitative research. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. 2005 Oct 15.
18-Creswell J. W, Plano Clark, V. L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage(2006).
19- Hancock B, Windridge K, Ockleford E. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. The NIHR RDS EM/YH; (Internet).2007.
20-Delavar A. Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences.Tehran: Virayesh; 2010.
21- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006 Jan. 1;3(2):77-101.
22- Frost. N. Qualitative research methods in psychology: from core to com bined approaches.2011. McGraw-Hill International.
23-Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006 Jan. 1;3(2):77-101.
24- Firmin M W. Them In the SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Reasearch Methods. published by SAGE.2008.
25- Moore DT. Curriculum at work. Journal of workplace learning. 2004 Sep 1.
26- Farzad Nia F, Safaee Movahed S, Ali Asgari M. Presenting a Framework for Human Resources Training and Development in Iranian Complex Projects . Human Resource Management in Oil Industry. 2016; 7 (28) :131-146.
27- Billett S. Workplace Experiences: Premises, Conceptions and Practices. Work-based Learning as a Pathway to Competence-based Education. 2019:25
28- Billett S. Constituting the workplace curriculum. Journal of curriculum studies. 2006 Feb 1;38(1):31-48.
29- Moore DT. Curriculum at work. Journal of workplace learning. 2004 Sep 1.
30- Billett S, Pavlova M. Learning through working life: Self and individuals’ agentic action. International journal of lifelong education. 2005 May 1;24(3):195-211.
31- Drohan S. A theoretical framework of workplace learning for entry-level software engineering graduates (Doctoral dissertation, Waterford Institute of Technology).
32- Boud D, Solomon N. Work as the curriculum: Pedagogical and identity implications. InPUB DATE 2000-12-00 NOTE 567p.; Conference organized by Research into Adult and Vocational Learning (RAVL) at the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS). Gleebooks," Studies in Continuing Education," and the Faculty of Education at UTS provided some financial 2000 Dec 10 (p. 55).
33- Utech JL, Roundtable MW. Contextualized curriculum for workplace education: An introductory guide. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. 2008 Jun.
34- Fathivajargah K. The dominant discourses of the workplace curriculum in education and human resource creation; Trends and Assumptions. Third National Conference on Training and Development of Human Resources, Milad Tower, Tehran.(2015).
35- Fathivajargah K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. Tehran: Elmostadan;2020.
36- Fathivajargah K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. Tehran: Elmostadan;2020.
37- Fathivajargah K. The dominant discourses of the workplace curriculum in education and human resource creation; Trends and Assumptions. Third National Conference on Training and Development of Human Resources, Milad Tower, Tehran.(2015).
38- Safaemovahed S. Heutagogy- based Workplace Curriculum Development Model (HWCDM). Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S)Vol. 13 (51); 2019, 5-26.
39- Safaemovahed S. Heutagogy- based Workplace Curriculum Development Model (HWCDM). Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S)Vol. 13 (51); 2019, 5-26.
40- Belfiore ME. Understanding Curriculum Development in the Workplace. A Resource for Educators. ABC Canada, 1450 Don Mills Road, Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2X7, Canada; 1996.
41- Roodi M, Fathi vajargah K, Arefi M, hakimzadeh R, sharifi M. Conceptualizing curriculum counseling as a new domain in the field of curriculum studies. CSTP. 2018; 6 (11) :105-140.
42- Pinar WF. What is curriculum theory?. Routledge; 2004 Feb 26.
43- Oliva P. Developing the Curriculum. Pearson Education: published by Allyn & Bacon;2008.
44- Killion J, Harrison C. curriculum specialist. Teachers, teaching and teachers.2006.
45- Pinar WF. What is curriculum theory?. Routledge; 2004 Feb 26.
46- Walker DF. Fundamentals of curriculum: Passion and professionalism. Routledge; 2002 Dec 18.
47- Fathivajargah K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. Tehran: Elmostadan;2020.
48- doosti hajiabadi, H., fathi vajargah, K., khorasani, A. Conceptualizing of workplace curriculum discourses; Neglected or emerging discourse. Research in Curriculum Planning, 2017; 14(52): 28-34.
49- Fathivajargah K, Khorasani A, Doosti H. Workplace Curriculum. Tehran: Iran Industrial Training and Research Center Publications;2016.
50- - Fathivajargah K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. Tehran: Elmostadan;2020.
51- Fathivajargah K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. Tehran: Elmostadan;2020.
52- Billett S. Towards a model of workplace learning: The learning curriculum. Studies in continuing education. 1996 Jan 1;18(1):43-58.
53- Moore DT. Curriculum at work. Journal of workplace learning. 2004 Sep 1.
54- Solomon N, Boud D, Leontios M, Staron M. Researchers are learners too: collaboration in research on workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2001 Dec 1.
55- Fathivajargah, K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. 2020. Tehran: Elmostadan.
56- Fathivajargah,K. Moving Beyond Reconceptualisation,Toward Recontextualisation / Multicontextualisation of Curriculum Studies in Iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies Vol.9, No.18,45 -69.
57- Fathivajargah K, Khorasani A, Doosti H. Workplace Curriculum. Tehran: Iran Industrial Training and Research Center Publications; 2016.
58- Fathivajargah K. The dominant discourses of the workplace curriculum in education and human resource creation; Trends and Assumptions. Third National Conference on Training and Development of Human Resources, Milad Tower, Tehran.(2015).
59- Safaemovahed S. Heutagogy- based Workplace Curriculum Development Model (HWCDM). Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S)Vol. 13 (51); 2019, 5-26.
60- Doosti H. Investigating and analyzing the dominant discourses on the workplace curriculum in Iranian organizations[dissertation]. Shahid Beheshi University,Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology; 2018.501 p.
61- Roodi M, Fathi vajargah K, Arefi M, hakimzadeh R, sharifi M. Conceptualizing curriculum counseling as a new domain in the field of curriculum studies. CSTP. 2018; 6 (11) :105-140.
62- Mehmandoust Ghamsari Z S, Fathi vajargah K, Khorasani A, Safaemovahed, S. Design aWorkplace Curriculum Model: A Research Synthesis. Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum. Vol.16 (8); 2021, 5-40.
63- Fathivajargah K. Recontextualistion/Multicontextualisation movement of curriculum field. Tehran: Elmostadan;2020