شناسایی و تجزیه و تحلیل شاخص های قابلیت های خدماتی در صنایع کوچک ایران با استفاده از ادغام رویکردهای مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری و میک مک فازی
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتیداود خسروانجم 1 * , علی رجب زاده قطری 2 , عباس مقبل 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
2 - Information Technology Management, School of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran
3 - استادیار دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
کلید واژه: قابلیت های خدماتی, مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری, صنایع کوچک, میک ¬مک فازی,
چکیده مقاله :
از دیدگاه مبتنی برمنابع، ارائه خدمات بطور عمده به منابع و قابلیت های سازمان بستگی دارد تا در بلندمدت مزیت رقابتی پایدار را ایجاد نماید. با بررسی ادبیات موضوع مشخص شد که هیچ نوع تحقیقی درباره ارتباط بین ابعاد و شاخص های قابلیت خدماتی جدا از عملکرد شرکت صورت نگرفته و شبکه ارتباطی و میزان اثربخشی آنها نیز تجزیه و تحلیل نشده و تمرکز بررسی ها بیشتر برروی ارتباط بین ابعاد با عملکرد شرکت بوده است. هدف از این پژوهش، استفاده از مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری جهت ساختاردهی به روابط بین شاخص های قابلیت های خدماتی و استفاده از تحلیل میک مک فازی جهت خوشه بندی شاخص ها می باشد. لذا براساس دیدگاه مبتنی برمنابع، ابعاد و قابلیت های خدماتی شامل قابلیت های مدیریتی، سازمانی، بازاریابی و کیفیت خدمات به صورت جامع از طریق ادبیات موضوع و مصاحبه با 11 نفر از خبرگان شناسایی و استخراج شدند. نتایج نشان داد که براساس مدل ISM شاخص های "کیفیت شرکت"، "کیفیت تعاملی"، "برنامه ریزی، کنترل و ادغام فعالیتها" و "تفکیک فعالیتها و سطح متمرکزسازی" شاخص های مهم و حیاتی هستند که به عنوان مبنا و پایه ساختار قابیلت های خدماتی محسوب می شوند و همچنین باتوجه به تحلیل میک مک فازی شاخص های "تجزیه و تحلیل و شکل دهی استراتژی"، "برنامه ریزی، کنترل و ادغام فعالیتها" و "کیفیت فیزیکی" در زمره «مهمترین» شاخص های قابلیت های خدماتی قرار گرفتند که قدرت بالایی در تأثیرگذاری بر سایر شاخص ها دارند لذا صنایع کوچک ایران باید گام -های اساسی به منظور تقویت این شاخص ها بر دارند.
From a resource-based view, service delivery relies heavily on the resources and capabilities of the organization to create sustainable competitive advantage over the long term. In reviewing the literature, no research has been conducted on the relationship between dimensions and criteria of the service capability apart from firm performance and the relationship network and their effectiveness have not been analyzed and the focus of the research has been on the relationship between dimensions and firm performance. The purpose of this study is identify the service capability criteria and use interpretive structural modeling to structure the relationships between these criteria as well as the use of the fuzzy MICMAC analysis to cluster the criteria. Therefore, based on a resource-based view, the service dimensions and capabilities including management, organizational, marketing and service quality were comprehensively identified and extracted through subject literature and interviews with 11 experts. The results showed that according to ISM model "Corporate quality", "interactive quality", "planning, control and integration of activities" and "differentiation of activities and level of centralization" are important criteria that are the basis of the structure of capability services are considered and also with respect to the fuzzy MICMAC analysis the criteria of "analysis and formulation of the strategy", "planning, control and integration of activities" and "physical quality" were classified as the "most important" criteria of service capabilities that have high power to influence they have other criteria, so Iran's small enterprises need to take major steps to strengthen this criteria
Kokkinou, A., & Cranage, D. A. (2013). Using self-service technology to reduce customer waiting times. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 33, No. 1, PP. 435-445.
Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y., & Malak, N. (2002). Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Production Economics, Vol. 76, No. 1, PP. 39-51.
Doherty, N.F., & Terry, M. (2009). The role of IS capabilities in delivering sustainable improvements to competitive positioning. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, PP. 100-116.
Wade, M.W., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, PP. 107-142.
Rapp, A., Trainor, K. J., & Agnihotri, R. (2010). Performance implications of customer linking capabilities: Examining the complementary role of customer orientation and CRM technology. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, No. 11, PP. 1229-1236.
Martin, S. L., Javalgi, R. G., & Ciravegna, L. (2018). Service advantage built on service capabilities: An empirical inquiry of international new ventures. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 88, No. 1, PP. 371-381.
Ringov, D. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance. Long Range Planning, Vol. 50, No. 1, PP. 653-664.
Su, Z., Peng, J., & Xiao, T. (2013). Technological Capability, Marketing Capability, and Firm Performance in Turbulent Conditions. Management and Organization Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, PP. 115-137. Trainor, K.J,. & Andzulis, J., Rapp, A., & Agnihotri, R. (2014). Social media technology usage and customer relationship performance: A capabilities-based examination of social CRM. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67, No. 1, PP. 1201-1208.
Cruz-Ros, S., & Gonzalez-Cruz,T.F. (2015). Service firm capabilities and performance: Contingent analysis of customer contact. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, No. 1, PP. 1612-1621.
Priem, R. L. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, PP. 219-235
Ethiraj, S. K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, PP. 25-45.
Mousavi, S., & Bossink, B. A. G. (2017). Firms’ capabilities for sustainable innovation: The case of biofuel for aviation. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 167, No. 1, PP. 1263-1275.
Ray, G., Muhanna, W.A., & Barney, J.B. (2005). Information technology and performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 4, PP. 625-652.
Baker, T., & Collier, D. A. (2005). The economic payout model for service guarantees. Decision Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 2, PP. 197–220
Ho, T. H., & Zheng, Yu-S. (2004). Setting customer expectation in service delivery: An integrated marketing-operations perspective. Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 4, PP. 479-488.
Hart, C.E.L., Heskett, J. L., & Sasser, W.E. (1991). Surviving a Customer’s Range. Successful Meetings, Vol. 40, No. 1, PP. 68-79
Skaggs, B. C., & Galli-Debicella, A. (2012). The effects of customer contact on organizational structure and performance in service firms. The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, PP. 337-352
Van Veen-Dirks, P., & Wijn, M. (2002). Strategic control: meshing critical success factors with the balanced scorecard. Long Range Planning, Vol. 35, No. 4, PP. 402-427.
Tippins, M.J., & Sohi, R.S. (2003). IT Competency and Firm Performance: Is Organizational Learning a Missing Link?. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 8, PP. 745-761.
Piccoli, G., Lui, T., & Grün, B. (2017). The impact of IT-enabled customer service systems on service personalization, customer service perceptions, and hotel performance. Tourism Management, Vol. 59, No. 1, PP. 349-362.
Theodosiou, M., Kehagias, J., & Katsikea, E. (2012). Strategic orientations, marketing capabilities and firm performance: An empirical investigation in the context of frontline managers in service organizations. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41, No. 1, PP. 1058-1070.
Barua, A., Konana, P., & Whinston, A.B. (2004). An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, PP. 585-620.
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt,M. A. (2009). Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 13, PP. 1375-1394.
Hitt, M. A., Biermant, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, PP. 13-28
Chen, J. S., Tsou, H. T., & Huang, A. Y. H. (2009). Service delivery innovation: Antecedents and impact on firm performance. Journal of Service Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, PP. 36-55.
Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D.W., & Mason, C. H. (2009).Market orientation, marketing capabilities and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 8, PP. 909-920.
Buil-Fabregá, M., Alonso-Almeida, M.D.M., & Bagur-Femenías, L. (2017). Individual dynamic managerial capabilities: Influence over environmental and social commitment under a gender perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 151, No. 1, PP. 371-379.
Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, PP. 1011-1025.
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, PP. 75-87.
Chung, H. F. L., Wang, C. L., Huang, P., & Yang, Z. (2016). Organizational capabilities and business performance: When and how does the dark side of managerial ties matter?. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 55, No. 1, PP. 70-82.
Wu, S. J. (2010). Operational capabilities: The secret ingredient. Decision Sciences Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, PP. 1-34
Guo, C., Jiang, C.X., & Yang, Q. (2014). The development of organizational capabilities and corporate enterepreneurial processes: The case of Chinese automobile firms. Published online in Wiley Online Library, Vol. 56, No. 6, PP. 483-500.
Takata, H. (2016). Effects of industry forces, market orientation, and marketing capabilities on business performance: An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturers from 2009 to 2011. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 1, PP. 5611-5619.
Skaggs, B.C., & Snow, C.C. (2004). Strategic signaling of capabilities by service firms in different information asymmetry environments. Strategic Organization, Vol. 2, No. 3, PP. 271-291.
Kang, G., & James, J. (2004). Service quality dimensions: an examination of Grönroos’s service quality model. Managing Service Quality, Vol. 14, No. 4, PP. 266-277.
پوپر، کارل ريموند.(1384). اسطوره چارچوب در دفاع از علم و عقلانيت. تهران، انتشارات طرح نو.
Jindal, A.,& Sangwan,K.S. (2013). Development of an interpretive structural model of drivers for reverse logistics implementation in Indian industry. Int.J.Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model, Vol. 5, No. 4, PP. 325-342.
Warfield, J.W. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transaction Systems Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 51-81.
آذر، عادل، خسروانی، فرزانه، جلالی، رضا.(1392). تحقیق در عملیات نرم (رویکردهای ساختاردهی مسئله). تهران، انتشارات سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
الفت، لعیا.(1395). الگوی عوامل تصمیم برون سپاری لجستیک با استفاده از مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری، فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، 11(42)،ص1-24.
Beikkhakhian, Y., Javanmardi, M., Karbasian, M., & Khayambashi, B. (2015). The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, No. 1, PP. 6224-6236.
Kannan, G., Pokharel, S., & Kumar, P.S. (2009). A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 54, No. 1, PP. 28-36.
Diabat, A., & Govindan,K.. (2011). An analysis of drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour.Conserv.Recycl, Vol. 55, No. 6, PP. 659-667.
Ravi,V., & Shankar, R. (2005). Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol.Forecast.Soc.Change, Vol. 72, No. 8, PP. 1011-1029.
Dubey R, & Ali SS.(2014). Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and the irinterrelationship using total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy MICMACanalysis.Glob J Flex Syst Manag, Vol. 15, No. 1, PP. 131-43.
Sindhu, S. Nehra, V. & Luthra, S. (2016). Identification and analysis of barriers in implementation of solar energy in Indian rural sector using integrated ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 62, No. 1, PP. 70-88.
Qureshi, M. Kumar, D. & Kumar, P. (2008). An integrated model to identify and classify the key criteria and their role in the assessment of 3PL services providers. Asia Pac J Mark Logist, Vol. 20, No. 1, PP. 227-49.
[ Saxena, J. & Vrat, P. (1992). Scenario building: a critical study of energy conservation in the Indian cement industry.Technol Forecast Soc Change, Vol. 4, No. 1, PP. 121-46.
Kuo, S. Y., Lin, P. C., & Lu, C. S. (2017). The effects of dynamic capabilities, service capabilities, competitive advantage, and organizational performance in container shipping. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 95, No. 1, PP. 356-371.